From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/xe: Alternative CCS fix.
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 22:56:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240821205637.552424-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Instead of making 64k CCS special, make it the only case. :)
I think the approach is interesting, so if there is no performance hit,
we should be able to get away with 64k pages always.
Maarten Lankhorst (2):
drm/xe: Align all 64k VRAM buffers physically when multiple of 64k.
drm/i915/display: Allowing looking up invalid modifiers to make xe
happy
Zbigniew Kempczyński (1):
drm/xe: Use 64K pages for scanout buffers for Battlemage
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c | 4 ++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/intel_fb_bo.c | 6 ++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 10 ++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 9 ++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 3 ++-
6 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-21 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-21 20:56 Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2024-08-21 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/xe: Align all 64k VRAM buffers physically when multiple of 64k Maarten Lankhorst
2024-08-22 12:12 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2024-08-22 13:57 ` Juha-Pekka Heikkila
2024-08-22 12:14 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2024-08-22 12:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-08-22 12:48 ` Thomas Hellström
2024-08-21 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/xe: Use 64K pages for scanout buffers for Battlemage Maarten Lankhorst
2024-08-21 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/display: Allowing looking up invalid modifiers to make xe happy Maarten Lankhorst
2024-08-21 20:59 ` [PATCH v2.1] " Maarten Lankhorst
2024-08-21 21:05 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Alternative CCS fix. (rev3) Patchwork
2024-08-21 21:05 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-08-21 21:06 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-08-21 21:18 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-08-21 21:21 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-08-21 21:22 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-08-21 21:44 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-08-22 6:15 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240821205637.552424-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox