Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, suraj.kandpal@intel.com,
	ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915/vdsc: Rename helper to check if the pipe supports dsc
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 18:48:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240829131828.2350930-9-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240829131828.2350930-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

Rename the helper is_pipe_dsc to intel_dsc_is_pipe_dsc to prepare for its
future use across multiple files. This change is a preliminary step towards
making the function non-static, enhancing its accessibility and
reusability.

Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
index 891346f1f09a..6d60b72a9dfb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ bool intel_dsc_source_support(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static bool is_pipe_dsc(struct intel_crtc *crtc, enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
+static bool intel_dsc_is_dsc_pipe(struct intel_crtc *crtc, enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
 
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ intel_dsc_power_domain(struct intel_crtc *crtc, enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
 	 */
 	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) == 12 && !IS_ROCKETLAKE(i915) && pipe == PIPE_A)
 		return POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_VDSC_PW2;
-	else if (is_pipe_dsc(crtc, cpu_transcoder))
+	else if (intel_dsc_is_dsc_pipe(crtc, cpu_transcoder))
 		return POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE(pipe);
 	else
 		return POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_VDSC_PW2;
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ static void intel_dsc_get_pps_reg(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, int
 	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
 	bool pipe_dsc;
 
-	pipe_dsc = is_pipe_dsc(crtc, cpu_transcoder);
+	pipe_dsc = intel_dsc_is_dsc_pipe(crtc, cpu_transcoder);
 
 	if (dsc_reg_num >= 3)
 		MISSING_CASE(dsc_reg_num);
@@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ static void intel_dsc_pps_configure(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 		rc_buf_thresh_dword[i / 4] |=
 			(u32)(vdsc_cfg->rc_buf_thresh[i] <<
 			      BITS_PER_BYTE * (i % 4));
-	if (!is_pipe_dsc(crtc, cpu_transcoder)) {
+	if (!intel_dsc_is_dsc_pipe(crtc, cpu_transcoder)) {
 		intel_de_write(dev_priv, DSCA_RC_BUF_THRESH_0,
 			       rc_buf_thresh_dword[0]);
 		intel_de_write(dev_priv, DSCA_RC_BUF_THRESH_0_UDW,
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static void intel_dsc_pps_configure(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 				RC_MAX_QP_SHIFT) |
 			       (vdsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_min_qp <<
 				RC_MIN_QP_SHIFT)) << 16 * (i % 2));
-	if (!is_pipe_dsc(crtc, cpu_transcoder)) {
+	if (!intel_dsc_is_dsc_pipe(crtc, cpu_transcoder)) {
 		intel_de_write(dev_priv, DSCA_RC_RANGE_PARAMETERS_0,
 			       rc_range_params_dword[0]);
 		intel_de_write(dev_priv, DSCA_RC_RANGE_PARAMETERS_0_UDW,
@@ -726,13 +726,13 @@ void intel_dsc_dp_pps_write(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 
 static i915_reg_t dss_ctl1_reg(struct intel_crtc *crtc, enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
 {
-	return is_pipe_dsc(crtc, cpu_transcoder) ?
+	return intel_dsc_is_dsc_pipe(crtc, cpu_transcoder) ?
 		ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(crtc->pipe) : DSS_CTL1;
 }
 
 static i915_reg_t dss_ctl2_reg(struct intel_crtc *crtc, enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
 {
-	return is_pipe_dsc(crtc, cpu_transcoder) ?
+	return intel_dsc_is_dsc_pipe(crtc, cpu_transcoder) ?
 		ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL2(crtc->pipe) : DSS_CTL2;
 }
 
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-29 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-29 13:18 [PATCH 00/19] Consolidation of DSS Control in Separate Files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915/display: Move all DSS control registers to a new file Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/dss_regs: Use REG_* macros for the DSS ctl bits Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 03/19] drm/i915/ddi: Move all mso related helpers to a new file Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915/dss: Move to struct intel_display Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Avoid using intel_dsi in configure_dual_link_mode Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Use intel_display " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Move helpers to configure dsi dual link to intel_dss Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 09/19] drm/i915/vdsc: Move all dss stuff in dss files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915/dss: Use struct intel_display in dss dsc helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915/display: Move dss stuff in intel_dss files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915/display: Rename static functions that use joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915/display: Separate out joiner stuff in a new file Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915/display: Move intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask to intel_joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915/display: Move helpers for primary joiner " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915/display: Move intel_crtc_is_joiner_secondary " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915/display: Move intel_crtc_joiner_secondary_pipes " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915/joiner: Use struct intel_display in intel_joiner_enabled_pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:18 ` [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915/joiner: Use struct intel_display in intel_joiner_supported_pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-29 13:38 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for Consolidation of DSS Control in Separate Files (rev2) Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-30  5:09 [PATCH 00/19] Consolidation of DSS Control in Separate Files Ankit Nautiyal
2024-08-30  5:09 ` [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915/vdsc: Rename helper to check if the pipe supports dsc Ankit Nautiyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240829131828.2350930-9-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox