From: Jonathan-Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: saurabhg.gupta@intel.com, alex.zuo@intel.com,
jonathan.cavitt@intel.com, matthew.d.roper@intel.com,
jani.nikula@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Apply workaround 14016747170
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 09:11:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240830161118.2055939-1-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com> (raw)
Some revisions of MTL do not properly report the correct value from the
FUSE3_MBC_MEDIA register. This results in the wrong value being
reported for the l3 mask.
Use the recommended replacement register in this case.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan-Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
CC: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
CC: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
---
v2: Update includes ordering (Jani)
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h | 3 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c | 8 ++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c | 9 +++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules | 1 +
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
index 0d1a4a9f4e119..e0d735a5a7fa1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
@@ -522,6 +522,9 @@
#define FORCEWAKE_MT(bit) BIT(bit)
#define FORCEWAKE_MT_MASK(bit) BIT((bit) + 16)
+#define MTL_GT_ACTIVITY_FACTOR XE_REG(0x138010)
+#define MTL_GT_L3_EXC_MASK REG_GENMASK(5, 3)
+
#define MTL_MEDIA_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS XE_REG(0x138030)
#define MTL_MEDIA_MC6 XE_REG(0x138048)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c
index 7d7bd0be6233e..3253eaefb18b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
#include "xe_gt_mcr.h"
+#include <generated/xe_wa_oob.h>
+
#include "regs/xe_gt_regs.h"
#include "xe_assert.h"
#include "xe_gt.h"
@@ -14,6 +16,7 @@
#include "xe_guc_hwconfig.h"
#include "xe_mmio.h"
#include "xe_sriov.h"
+#include "xe_wa.h"
/**
* DOC: GT Multicast/Replicated (MCR) Register Support
@@ -245,6 +248,11 @@ static void init_steering_l3bank(struct xe_gt *gt)
u32 bank_mask = REG_FIELD_GET(GT_L3_EXC_MASK,
xe_mmio_read32(gt, XEHP_FUSE4));
+ /* Wa_14016747170 */
+ if (XE_WA(gt, 14016747170))
+ bank_mask = REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_GT_L3_EXC_MASK,
+ xe_mmio_read32(gt, MTL_GT_ACTIVITY_FACTOR));
+
/*
* Group selects mslice, instance selects bank within mslice.
* Bank 0 is always valid _except_ when the bank mask is 010b.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c
index 0662f71c6ede7..f1946ce0d937b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c
@@ -8,10 +8,13 @@
#include <linux/bitmap.h>
#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <generated/xe_wa_oob.h>
+
#include "regs/xe_gt_regs.h"
#include "xe_assert.h"
#include "xe_gt.h"
#include "xe_mmio.h"
+#include "xe_wa.h"
static void
load_dss_mask(struct xe_gt *gt, xe_dss_mask_t mask, int numregs, ...)
@@ -144,6 +147,12 @@ load_l3_bank_mask(struct xe_gt *gt, xe_l3_bank_mask_t l3_bank_mask)
u32 fuse4 = xe_mmio_read32(gt, XEHP_FUSE4);
u32 bank_val = REG_FIELD_GET(GT_L3_EXC_MASK, fuse4);
+ /* Wa_14016747170 */
+ if (XE_WA(gt, 14016747170)) {
+ fuse4 = xe_mmio_read32(gt, MTL_GT_ACTIVITY_FACTOR);
+ bank_val = REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_GT_L3_EXC_MASK, fuse4);
+ }
+
bitmap_set_value8(per_mask_bit, 0x3, 0);
gen_l3_mask_from_pattern(xe, per_node, per_mask_bit, 2, bank_val);
gen_l3_mask_from_pattern(xe, l3_bank_mask, per_node, 4,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
index 920ca50601466..5bac4123b5db1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
@@ -37,3 +37,4 @@
16023588340 GRAPHICS_VERSION(2001)
14019789679 GRAPHICS_VERSION(1255)
GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(1270, 2004)
+14016747170 GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(1270, 1271), GRAPHICS_STEP(A0, B0)
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-30 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-30 16:11 Jonathan-Cavitt [this message]
2024-08-30 16:34 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Apply workaround 14016747170 (rev2) Patchwork
2024-08-30 16:35 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-08-30 16:36 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-08-30 16:56 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-08-30 16:58 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-08-30 17:00 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-08-30 17:32 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-08-31 6:18 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-02 11:16 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Apply workaround 14016747170 Pottumuttu, Sai Teja
2024-09-03 14:17 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240830161118.2055939-1-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--to=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--cc=alex.zuo@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=saurabhg.gupta@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox