From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77997CEACDD for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 15:32:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809DE10E0B7; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 15:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="naILaSEh"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org (nyc.source.kernel.org [147.75.193.91]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4036810E4FB; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F772A425C7; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FD3BC4CEC7; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:20:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1727706058; bh=1eRBRJrzOiuIVTVGRLAO8jbOWOlpEY4/q5p7G1s7jCE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=naILaSEhwqimNgUULIFTqSlwxMUbgmh8C2eC73P2q65wypavM5LFHzjS54Dk2AIGy XRAm382kcAq7sXbjLKdoiAbgWueaiQV5eTbTEX8TOfywWXdDa1oTcNbxiZnDz4/9le 1mBhLOwyv/Ba3XA13I3vqRQQfHu/UBcjhOzTPQ+4= Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 10:20:57 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Daniel Gomez Cc: I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org, tools@kernel.org, d+samsung@kruces.com Subject: Re: Incorrect response address when using B4 Message-ID: <20240930-rustling-auburn-jaguar-23d200@lemur> References: <20240930133007.u4vm5qj5urikpmvc@AALNPWDAGOMEZ1.aal.scsc.local> <20240930-sapphire-swift-of-reverence-168e2b@lemur> <20240930141839.3rjfom4c2tca655n@AALNPWDAGOMEZ1.aal.scsc.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240930141839.3rjfom4c2tca655n@AALNPWDAGOMEZ1.aal.scsc.local> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 15:32:45 +0000 X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 04:18:39PM GMT, Daniel Gomez wrote: > > Was it an automated tool that sent you that message? Normally, email clients > > would honour the "Reply-To" field and not use the From: address put in by the > > relay. > > It was a CI Patchwork tool. Response [1] to my patch was sent from "From: > Patchwork ". > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/172735727458.1107233.1757281470637305143@2413ebb6fbb6/ > > I think that tool is ignoring the "Reply-To" field [2] from the B4 message and > using the From field. > > From: Daniel Gomez via B4 Relay > Reply-To: da.gomez@samsung.com It's no big deal as long as you got the email response in the end. We expect this to happen with a lot of automation, which is why any replies to the relay address are auto-discarded. -K