From: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] drm/xe/guc: Fix missing init value and add register order check
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:23:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241023192307.746525-1-zhanjun.dong@intel.com> (raw)
Fix missing initial value for last_value.
For GuC capture register definition, it is required to define 64bit
register in a pair of 2 consecutive 32bit register entries, low first,
then hi. Add code to check this order.
Fixes: 0f1fdf559225 ("drm/xe/guc: Save manual engine capture into capture list")
Signed-off-by: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
index 8b6cb786a2aa..d7ff7dd60a1d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct __guc_capture_parsed_output {
* A 64 bit register define requires 2 consecutive entries,
* with low dword first and hi dword the second.
* 2. Register name: null for incompleted define
+ * 3. Incorrect order will trigger XE_WARN.
*/
#define COMMON_XELP_BASE_GLOBAL \
{ FORCEWAKE_GT, REG_32BIT, 0, 0, "FORCEWAKE_GT"}
@@ -1678,10 +1679,10 @@ snapshot_print_by_list_order(struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_
struct xe_devcoredump *devcoredump = &xe->devcoredump;
struct xe_devcoredump_snapshot *devcore_snapshot = &devcoredump->snapshot;
struct gcap_reg_list_info *reginfo = NULL;
- u32 last_value, i;
- bool is_ext;
+ u32 i, last_value = 0;
+ bool is_ext, low32_ready = false;
- if (!list || list->num_regs == 0)
+ if (!list || !list->list || list->num_regs == 0)
return;
XE_WARN_ON(!devcore_snapshot->matched_node);
@@ -1706,11 +1707,27 @@ snapshot_print_by_list_order(struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_
value = reg->value;
if (reg_desc->data_type == REG_64BIT_LOW_DW) {
last_value = value;
+
+ /*
+ * A 64 bit register define requires 2 consecutive
+ * entries in register list, with low dword first
+ * and hi dword the second, like:
+ * { XXX_REG_LO(0), REG_64BIT_LOW_DW, 0, 0, NULL},
+ * { XXX_REG_HI(0), REG_64BIT_HI_DW, 0, 0, "XXX_REG"},
+ *
+ * Incorrect order will trigger XE_WARN.
+ */
+ XE_WARN_ON(low32_ready); /* Possible double low here */
+ low32_ready = true;
/* Low 32 bit dword saved, continue for high 32 bit */
continue;
} else if (reg_desc->data_type == REG_64BIT_HI_DW) {
u64 value_qw = ((u64)value << 32) | last_value;
+ /* Incorrect 64bit register order. Possible missing low */
+ XE_WARN_ON(!low32_ready);
+ low32_ready = false;
+
drm_printf(p, "\t%s: 0x%016llx\n", reg_desc->regname, value_qw);
continue;
}
@@ -1727,6 +1744,9 @@ snapshot_print_by_list_order(struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_
drm_printf(p, "\t%s: 0x%08x\n", reg_desc->regname, value);
}
}
+
+ /* Incorrect 64bit register order. Possible missing high */
+ XE_WARN_ON(low32_ready);
}
/**
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-10-23 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-23 19:23 Zhanjun Dong [this message]
2024-10-24 11:09 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v1,1/1] drm/xe/guc: Fix missing init value and add register order check Patchwork
2024-10-24 11:09 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-24 11:10 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-24 11:22 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-24 11:24 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-24 11:26 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-24 11:27 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] " Nirmoy Das
2024-10-24 14:13 ` Dong, Zhanjun
2024-10-24 23:50 ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2024-10-31 14:22 ` Dong, Zhanjun
2024-10-31 16:55 ` Dong, Zhanjun
2024-10-24 11:47 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v1,1/1] " Patchwork
2024-10-25 6:27 ` ✓ CI.FULL: success " Patchwork
2024-10-29 0:00 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v1,1/1] drm/xe/guc: Fix missing init value and add register order check (rev2) Patchwork
2024-10-29 0:01 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 0:02 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 0:13 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 0:16 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 0:17 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 0:40 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-29 1:39 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2024-10-31 22:38 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] drm/xe/guc: Fix missing init value and add register order check Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2024-11-01 14:43 ` Dong, Zhanjun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241023192307.746525-1-zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
--to=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox