From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Michal Wajdeczko" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
"Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
"Marcin Bernatowicz" <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/xe/relay: Don't use GFP_KERNEL for new transactions
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 16:37:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250131153713.808-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (raw)
VFs use a relay transaction during the resume/reset flow and use
of the GFP_KERNEL flag may conflict with the reclaim:
-> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
[ ] __lock_acquire+0x1874/0x2bc0
[ ] lock_acquire+0xd2/0x310
[ ] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xc5/0x100
[ ] mempool_alloc_noprof+0x5c/0x1b0
[ ] __relay_get_transaction+0xdc/0xa10 [xe]
[ ] relay_send_to+0x251/0xe50 [xe]
[ ] xe_guc_relay_send_to_pf+0x79/0x3a0 [xe]
[ ] xe_gt_sriov_vf_connect+0x90/0x4d0 [xe]
[ ] xe_uc_init_hw+0x157/0x3b0 [xe]
[ ] do_gt_restart+0x1ae/0x650 [xe]
[ ] xe_gt_resume+0xb6/0x120 [xe]
[ ] xe_pm_runtime_resume+0x15b/0x370 [xe]
[ ] xe_pci_runtime_resume+0x73/0x90 [xe]
[ ] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa0/0x100
[ ] __rpm_callback+0x4d/0x170
[ ] rpm_callback+0x64/0x70
[ ] rpm_resume+0x594/0x790
[ ] __pm_runtime_resume+0x4e/0x90
[ ] xe_pm_runtime_get_ioctl+0x9c/0x160 [xe]
Since we have a preallocated pool of relay transactions, which
should cover all our normal relay use cases, we may use the
GFP_NOWAIT flag when allocating new outgoing transactions.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
---
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_relay.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_relay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_relay.c
index 8f62de026724..e5dc94f3e618 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_relay.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_relay.c
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ __relay_get_transaction(struct xe_guc_relay *relay, bool incoming, u32 remote, u
* with CTB lock held which is marked as used in the reclaim path.
* Btw, that's one of the reason why we use mempool here!
*/
- txn = mempool_alloc(&relay->pool, incoming ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL);
+ txn = mempool_alloc(&relay->pool, incoming ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_NOWAIT);
if (!txn)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
--
2.47.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-01-31 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-31 15:37 Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-01-31 15:42 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/relay: Don't use GFP_KERNEL for new transactions Patchwork
2025-01-31 15:43 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 15:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 16:01 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 16:04 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 16:05 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 16:25 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 21:21 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-04 10:58 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-02-03 9:20 ` [PATCH] " Bernatowicz, Marcin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250131153713.808-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox