From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] drm/xe: Fix xe_display_fini() calls
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 14:31:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250131223140.4144292-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250131223140.4144292-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
xe_display_fini() undoes things from xe_display_init() (technically from
intel_display_driver_probe()). Those `goto err` in xe_device_probe()
were wrong and being accumulated over time.
Commit 65e366ace5ee ("drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for
display") made it easier to fix now that we don't have xe_display_* init
calls spread on xe_device_probe(). Change xe_display_init() to use
devm_add_action_or_reset() that will finalize display in the right
order.
While at it, also add a newline and comment about calling
xe_driver_flr_fini.
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h | 2 --
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
index 651799c946ace..302f533af037d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
@@ -161,27 +161,29 @@ int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
return err;
}
-int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe)
+static void xe_display_fini(void *arg)
{
+ struct xe_device *xe = arg;
struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
- if (!xe->info.probe_display)
- return 0;
-
- return intel_display_driver_probe(display);
+ intel_hpd_poll_fini(xe);
+ intel_hdcp_component_fini(display);
+ intel_audio_deinit(display);
}
-void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe)
+int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe)
{
struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
+ int err;
if (!xe->info.probe_display)
- return;
+ return 0;
- intel_hpd_poll_fini(xe);
+ err = intel_display_driver_probe(display);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
- intel_hdcp_component_fini(display);
- intel_audio_deinit(display);
+ return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini, xe);
}
void xe_display_register(struct xe_device *xe)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
index e2a99624f7064..685dc74402fb8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe);
int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe);
int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe);
-void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe);
void xe_display_register(struct xe_device *xe);
void xe_display_unregister(struct xe_device *xe);
@@ -54,7 +53,6 @@ static inline int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
static inline int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
static inline int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
-static inline void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe) {}
static inline void xe_display_register(struct xe_device *xe) {}
static inline void xe_display_unregister(struct xe_device *xe) {}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
index 8a2763e8a6e27..589bbe21c32b4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
@@ -734,6 +734,7 @@ static int probe_has_flat_ccs(struct xe_device *xe)
"Flat CCS has been disabled in bios, May lead to performance impact");
xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -802,22 +803,26 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
err = xe_devcoredump_init(xe);
if (err)
return err;
+
+ /*
+ * From here on, if a step fails, make sure a Driver-FLR is triggereed
+ */
err = devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_driver_flr_fini, xe);
if (err)
return err;
err = probe_has_flat_ccs(xe);
if (err)
- goto err;
+ return err;
err = xe_vram_probe(xe);
if (err)
- goto err;
+ return err;
for_each_tile(tile, xe, id) {
err = xe_tile_init_noalloc(tile);
if (err)
- goto err;
+ return err;
}
/* Allocate and map stolen after potential VRAM resize */
@@ -831,12 +836,12 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
*/
err = xe_display_init_early(xe);
if (err)
- goto err;
+ return err;
for_each_tile(tile, xe, id) {
err = xe_tile_init(tile);
if (err)
- goto err;
+ return err;
}
err = xe_irq_install(xe);
@@ -896,8 +901,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
break;
}
-err:
- xe_display_fini(xe);
return err;
}
@@ -918,8 +921,6 @@ void xe_device_remove(struct xe_device *xe)
xe_device_remove_display(xe);
- xe_display_fini(xe);
-
xe_oa_fini(xe);
xe_heci_gsc_fini(xe);
--
2.48.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-31 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-31 22:31 [PATCH 0/7] Cleanup error handling on probe Lucas De Marchi
2025-01-31 22:31 ` Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2025-02-03 20:32 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/xe: Fix xe_display_fini() calls Rodrigo Vivi
2025-01-31 22:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/xe: Fix error handling in xe_irq_install() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-03 20:36 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-01-31 22:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/xe: Fix xe_tile_init_noalloc() error propagation Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-03 14:21 ` Francois Dugast
2025-01-31 22:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/xe: Stop ignoring errors from xe_ttm_stolen_mgr_init() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-03 14:10 ` Francois Dugast
2025-01-31 22:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/xe: Cleanup unwind of gt initialization Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-01 6:24 ` Raag Jadav
2025-02-01 15:55 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-02 8:09 ` Raag Jadav
2025-01-31 22:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/xe: Cleanup extra calls to xe_hw_fence_irq_finish() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-03 21:46 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-01-31 22:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/xe: Move oa fini to xe_oa Lucas De Marchi
2025-01-31 22:37 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Cleanup error handling on probe Patchwork
2025-01-31 22:37 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 22:38 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 22:55 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 22:57 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 22:59 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 23:32 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-01 8:05 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-02-03 18:39 ` [PATCH 0/7] " Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-04 8:58 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-04 14:50 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-04 18:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-04 22:42 ` Rodrigo Vivi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250131223140.4144292-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox