Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/xe: Carve out wopcm portion from the stolen memory
Date: Fri,  7 Feb 2025 17:43:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250207164334.1393054-1-nirmoy.das@intel.com> (raw)

Top of stolen memory is wopcm which shouldn't be accessed so remove
that portion of memory from the stolen memory.

Fixes: d8b52a02cb40 ("drm/xe: Implement stolen memory.")
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.c | 54 ++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.c
index 423856cc18d4..d414421f8c13 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.c
@@ -57,12 +57,35 @@ bool xe_ttm_stolen_cpu_access_needs_ggtt(struct xe_device *xe)
 	return GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) < 1270 && !IS_DGFX(xe);
 }
 
+static u32 get_wopcm_size(struct xe_device *xe)
+{
+	u32 wopcm_size;
+	u64 val;
+
+	val = xe_mmio_read64_2x32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe), STOLEN_RESERVED);
+	val = REG_FIELD_GET64(WOPCM_SIZE_MASK, val);
+
+	switch (val) {
+	case 0x5 ... 0x6:
+		val--;
+		fallthrough;
+	case 0x0 ... 0x3:
+		wopcm_size = (1U << val) * SZ_1M;
+		break;
+	default:
+		WARN(1, "Missing case wopcm_size=%llx\n", val);
+		wopcm_size = 0;
+	}
+
+	return wopcm_size;
+}
+
 static s64 detect_bar2_dgfx(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_ttm_stolen_mgr *mgr)
 {
 	struct xe_tile *tile = xe_device_get_root_tile(xe);
 	struct xe_mmio *mmio = xe_root_tile_mmio(xe);
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev);
-	u64 stolen_size;
+	u64 stolen_size, wopcm_size;
 	u64 tile_offset;
 	u64 tile_size;
 
@@ -74,7 +97,13 @@ static s64 detect_bar2_dgfx(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_ttm_stolen_mgr *mgr)
 	if (drm_WARN_ON(&xe->drm, tile_size < mgr->stolen_base))
 		return 0;
 
+	/* Carve out the top of DSM as it contains the reserved WOPCM region */
+	wopcm_size = get_wopcm_size(xe);
+	if (drm_WARN_ON(&xe->drm, !wopcm_size))
+		return 0;
+
 	stolen_size = tile_size - mgr->stolen_base;
+	stolen_size -= wopcm_size;
 
 	/* Verify usage fits in the actual resource available */
 	if (mgr->stolen_base + stolen_size <= pci_resource_len(pdev, LMEM_BAR))
@@ -89,29 +118,6 @@ static s64 detect_bar2_dgfx(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_ttm_stolen_mgr *mgr)
 	return ALIGN_DOWN(stolen_size, SZ_1M);
 }
 
-static u32 get_wopcm_size(struct xe_device *xe)
-{
-	u32 wopcm_size;
-	u64 val;
-
-	val = xe_mmio_read64_2x32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe), STOLEN_RESERVED);
-	val = REG_FIELD_GET64(WOPCM_SIZE_MASK, val);
-
-	switch (val) {
-	case 0x5 ... 0x6:
-		val--;
-		fallthrough;
-	case 0x0 ... 0x3:
-		wopcm_size = (1U << val) * SZ_1M;
-		break;
-	default:
-		WARN(1, "Missing case wopcm_size=%llx\n", val);
-		wopcm_size = 0;
-	}
-
-	return wopcm_size;
-}
-
 static u32 detect_bar2_integrated(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_ttm_stolen_mgr *mgr)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev);
-- 
2.46.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-02-07 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-07 16:43 Nirmoy Das [this message]
2025-02-07 18:28 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Carve out wopcm portion from the stolen memory Patchwork
2025-02-07 18:28 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 18:29 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 18:46 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 18:48 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 18:49 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 22:55 ` [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-10 15:09   ` Nirmoy Das
2025-02-08  7:14 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for " Patchwork
2025-02-10  6:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250207164334.1393054-1-nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --to=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox