Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/gt: Replace TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE readout
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:38:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250221003843.443559-8-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250221003843.443559-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

The whole GT CS clock initialization area is poorly documented in the
specs and a lot of this code seems to have been inherited from the
Windows driver team long ago.  There's nothing in the specs that
specifically explains using the display reference frequency, as taken
from TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE register, to determine the GT command streamer
clock.  But if the goal is just to get the display reference clock, we
already have existing display code that takes care of that in a more
straightforward manner (i.e., by either reading the strap register or
using a per-platform constant).  Let's drop the usage of
TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE (which is a bit questionable to begin with since this
is a display debug register) and replace it with a call to our existing
display function.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_clock_utils.c    | 31 ++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_clock_utils.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_clock_utils.c
index 6e63505fe478..adc21c3322da 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_clock_utils.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_clock_utils.c
@@ -11,23 +11,6 @@
 #include "intel_gt_regs.h"
 #include "soc/intel_dram.h"
 
-static u32 read_reference_ts_freq(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
-{
-	u32 ts_override = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN9_TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE);
-	u32 base_freq, frac_freq;
-
-	base_freq = ((ts_override & GEN9_TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE_US_COUNTER_DIVIDER_MASK) >>
-		     GEN9_TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE_US_COUNTER_DIVIDER_SHIFT) + 1;
-	base_freq *= 1000000;
-
-	frac_freq = ((ts_override &
-		      GEN9_TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE_US_COUNTER_DENOMINATOR_MASK) >>
-		     GEN9_TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE_US_COUNTER_DENOMINATOR_SHIFT);
-	frac_freq = 1000000 / (frac_freq + 1);
-
-	return base_freq + frac_freq;
-}
-
 static u32 gen11_get_crystal_clock_freq(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
 					u32 rpm_config_reg)
 {
@@ -64,12 +47,14 @@ static u32 gen11_read_clock_frequency(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 	 * We do not, and we assume nobody else does.
 	 *
 	 * First figure out the reference frequency. There are 2 ways
-	 * we can compute the frequency, either through the
-	 * TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE register or through RPM_CONFIG. CTC_MODE
-	 * tells us which one we should use.
+	 * we can compute the frequency, either from the display reference
+	 * clock or through RPM_CONFIG. CTC_MODE tells us which one we should
+	 * use.
 	 */
 	if ((ctc_reg & CTC_SOURCE_PARAMETER_MASK) == CTC_SOURCE_DIVIDE_LOGIC) {
-		freq = read_reference_ts_freq(uncore);
+		struct intel_display *display = &uncore->i915->display;
+
+		freq = intel_display_get_refclk(display) * 1000;
 	} else {
 		u32 c0 = intel_uncore_read(uncore, RPM_CONFIG0);
 
@@ -93,7 +78,9 @@ static u32 gen9_read_clock_frequency(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 	u32 freq = 0;
 
 	if ((ctc_reg & CTC_SOURCE_PARAMETER_MASK) == CTC_SOURCE_DIVIDE_LOGIC) {
-		freq = read_reference_ts_freq(uncore);
+		struct intel_display *display = &uncore->i915->display;
+
+		freq = intel_display_get_refclk(display) * 1000;
 	} else {
 		freq = IS_GEN9_LP(uncore->i915) ? 19200000 : 24000000;
 
-- 
2.48.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-21  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-21  0:38 [PATCH 0/4] Stop accessing display TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE in GT code Matt Roper
2025-02-21  0:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/display: Make refclk fetching logic reusable Matt Roper
2025-02-24  9:13   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-24 13:31   ` Vivekanandan, Balasubramani
2025-02-21  0:38 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2025-02-24 13:55   ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/gt: Replace TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE readout Vivekanandan, Balasubramani
2025-02-21  0:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe: Drop usage of TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE Matt Roper
2025-02-21  3:35   ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-21  4:25   ` kernel test robot
2025-02-24 14:13   ` Vivekanandan, Balasubramani
2025-02-21  0:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe/sriov: Drop TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE from Xe2 runtime regs Matt Roper
2025-02-21  0:44 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Stop accessing display TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE in GT code Patchwork
2025-02-21  0:44 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-02-21  0:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-02-21  1:02 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-21  1:05 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-21  1:06 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-21  1:26 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-21 17:01 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250221003843.443559-8-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox