From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/xe/userptr: fix EFAULT handling
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:38:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250221143840.167150-5-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250221143840.167150-4-matthew.auld@intel.com>
Currently we treat EFAULT from hmm_range_fault() as a non-fatal error
when called from xe_vm_userptr_pin() with the idea that we want to avoid
killing the entire vm and chucking an error, under the assumption that
the user just did an unmap or something, and has no intention of
actually touching that memory from the GPU. At this point we have
already zapped the PTEs so any access should generate a page fault, and
if the pin fails there also it will then become fatal.
However it looks like it's possible for the userptr vma to still be on
the rebind list in preempt_rebind_work_func(), if we had to retry the
pin again due to something happening in the caller before we did the
rebind step, but in the meantime needing to re-validate the userptr and
this time hitting the EFAULT.
This explains an internal user report of hitting:
[ 191.738349] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 157 at drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_res_cursor.h:158 xe_pt_stage_bind.constprop.0+0x60a/0x6b0 [xe]
[ 191.738551] Workqueue: xe-ordered-wq preempt_rebind_work_func [xe]
[ 191.738616] RIP: 0010:xe_pt_stage_bind.constprop.0+0x60a/0x6b0 [xe]
[ 191.738690] Call Trace:
[ 191.738692] <TASK>
[ 191.738694] ? show_regs+0x69/0x80
[ 191.738698] ? __warn+0x93/0x1a0
[ 191.738703] ? xe_pt_stage_bind.constprop.0+0x60a/0x6b0 [xe]
[ 191.738759] ? report_bug+0x18f/0x1a0
[ 191.738764] ? handle_bug+0x63/0xa0
[ 191.738767] ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x70
[ 191.738770] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20
[ 191.738777] ? xe_pt_stage_bind.constprop.0+0x60a/0x6b0 [xe]
[ 191.738834] ? ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 191.738849] bind_op_prepare+0x105/0x7b0 [xe]
[ 191.738906] ? dma_resv_reserve_fences+0x301/0x380
[ 191.738912] xe_pt_update_ops_prepare+0x28c/0x4b0 [xe]
[ 191.738966] ? kmemleak_alloc+0x4b/0x80
[ 191.738973] ops_execute+0x188/0x9d0 [xe]
[ 191.739036] xe_vm_rebind+0x4ce/0x5a0 [xe]
[ 191.739098] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x4d/0x60
[ 191.739112] preempt_rebind_work_func+0x76f/0xd00 [xe]
Followed by NPD, when running some workload, since the sg was never
actually populated but the vma is still marked for rebind when it should
be skipped for this special EFAULT case. This is confirmed to fix the
user report.
v2 (MattB):
- Move earlier.
v3 (MattB):
- Update the commit message to make it clear that this indeed fixes the
issue.
Fixes: 521db22a1d70 ("drm/xe: Invalidate userptr VMA on page pin fault")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.10+
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
index 3dbfb20a7c60..0118a1147668 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
@@ -682,6 +682,18 @@ int xe_vm_userptr_pin(struct xe_vm *vm)
err = xe_vma_userptr_pin_pages(uvma);
if (err == -EFAULT) {
list_del_init(&uvma->userptr.repin_link);
+ /*
+ * We might have already done the pin once already, but
+ * then had to retry before the re-bind happened, due
+ * some other condition in the caller, but in the
+ * meantime the userptr got dinged by the notifier such
+ * that we need to revalidate here, but this time we hit
+ * the EFAULT. In such a case make sure we remove
+ * ourselves from the rebind list to avoid going down in
+ * flames.
+ */
+ if (!list_empty(&uvma->vma.combined_links.rebind))
+ list_del_init(&uvma->vma.combined_links.rebind);
/* Wait for pending binds */
xe_vm_lock(vm, false);
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-21 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-21 14:38 [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/xe/userptr: restore invalidation list on error Matthew Auld
2025-02-21 14:38 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2025-02-21 14:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/xe/userptr: remove tmp_evict list Matthew Auld
2025-02-21 15:39 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v3,1/3] drm/xe/userptr: restore invalidation list on error Patchwork
2025-02-21 15:39 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-02-21 15:40 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-02-21 15:57 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-21 15:59 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-21 16:01 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-21 16:28 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-21 17:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] " Matthew Brost
2025-02-22 5:26 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: success for series starting with [v3,1/3] " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250221143840.167150-5-matthew.auld@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox