Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>, Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Fix locking when skipping CSN before topology probing
Date: Fri,  7 Mar 2025 20:31:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250307183152.3822170-1-imre.deak@intel.com> (raw)

The handling of the MST Connection Status Notify message is skipped if
the probing of the topology is still pending. Acquiring the
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr::probe_lock for this in
drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req() is problematic: the task/work this function
is called from is also responsible for handling MST down-request replies
(in drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep()). Thus drm_dp_mst_link_probe_work() -
holding already probe_lock - could be blocked waiting for an MST
down-request reply while drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req() is waiting for
probe_lock while processing a CSN message. This leads to the probe
work's down-request message timing out.

A scenario similar to the above leading to a down-request timeout is
handling a CSN message in drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(), holding the
probe_lock and sending down-request messages while a second CSN message
sent by the sink subsequently is handled by drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req().

Fix the above by moving the logic to skip the CSN handling to
drm_dp_mst_process_up_req(). This function is called from a work
(separate from the task/work handling new up/down messages), already
holding probe_lock. This solves the above timeout issue, since handling
of down-request replies won't be blocked by probe_lock.

Fixes: ddf983488c3e ("drm/dp_mst: Skip CSN if topology probing is not done yet")
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.6+
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 40 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 8b68bb3fbffb0..3a1f1ffc7b552 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -4036,6 +4036,22 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool primary_mstb_probing_is_done(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
+{
+	bool probing_done = false;
+
+	mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
+
+	if (mgr->mst_primary && drm_dp_mst_topology_try_get_mstb(mgr->mst_primary)) {
+		probing_done = mgr->mst_primary->link_address_sent;
+		drm_dp_mst_topology_put_mstb(mgr->mst_primary);
+	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
+
+	return probing_done;
+}
+
 static inline bool
 drm_dp_mst_process_up_req(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 			  struct drm_dp_pending_up_req *up_req)
@@ -4066,8 +4082,12 @@ drm_dp_mst_process_up_req(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 
 	/* TODO: Add missing handler for DP_RESOURCE_STATUS_NOTIFY events */
 	if (msg->req_type == DP_CONNECTION_STATUS_NOTIFY) {
-		dowork = drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(mstb, &msg->u.conn_stat);
-		hotplug = true;
+		if (!primary_mstb_probing_is_done(mgr)) {
+			drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, "Got CSN before finish topology probing. Skip it.\n");
+		} else {
+			dowork = drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(mstb, &msg->u.conn_stat);
+			hotplug = true;
+		}
 	}
 
 	drm_dp_mst_topology_put_mstb(mstb);
@@ -4149,10 +4169,11 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
 	drm_dp_send_up_ack_reply(mgr, mst_primary, up_req->msg.req_type,
 				 false);
 
+	drm_dp_mst_topology_put_mstb(mst_primary);
+
 	if (up_req->msg.req_type == DP_CONNECTION_STATUS_NOTIFY) {
 		const struct drm_dp_connection_status_notify *conn_stat =
 			&up_req->msg.u.conn_stat;
-		bool handle_csn;
 
 		drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, "Got CSN: pn: %d ldps:%d ddps: %d mcs: %d ip: %d pdt: %d\n",
 			    conn_stat->port_number,
@@ -4161,16 +4182,6 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
 			    conn_stat->message_capability_status,
 			    conn_stat->input_port,
 			    conn_stat->peer_device_type);
-
-		mutex_lock(&mgr->probe_lock);
-		handle_csn = mst_primary->link_address_sent;
-		mutex_unlock(&mgr->probe_lock);
-
-		if (!handle_csn) {
-			drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, "Got CSN before finish topology probing. Skip it.");
-			kfree(up_req);
-			goto out_put_primary;
-		}
 	} else if (up_req->msg.req_type == DP_RESOURCE_STATUS_NOTIFY) {
 		const struct drm_dp_resource_status_notify *res_stat =
 			&up_req->msg.u.resource_stat;
@@ -4185,9 +4196,6 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
 	list_add_tail(&up_req->next, &mgr->up_req_list);
 	mutex_unlock(&mgr->up_req_lock);
 	queue_work(system_long_wq, &mgr->up_req_work);
-
-out_put_primary:
-	drm_dp_mst_topology_put_mstb(mst_primary);
 out_clear_reply:
 	reset_msg_rx_state(&mgr->up_req_recv);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.44.2


             reply	other threads:[~2025-03-07 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-07 18:31 Imre Deak [this message]
2025-03-07 21:49 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/dp_mst: Fix locking when skipping CSN before topology probing Patchwork
2025-03-07 21:50 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-03-07 21:51 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-03-07 22:08 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-03-07 22:10 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-07 22:12 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-03-07 22:49 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-03-09  7:21 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-10  8:59 ` [PATCH] " Lin, Wayne
2025-03-10 11:00   ` Imre Deak
2025-03-10 13:01     ` Lin, Wayne
2025-03-10 17:24       ` Imre Deak
2025-03-10 21:59         ` Lyude Paul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250307183152.3822170-1-imre.deak@intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=Wayne.Lin@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox