From: Oak Zeng <oak.zeng@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Thomas.Hellstrom@linux.intel.com, matthew.brost@intel.com,
jonathan.cavitt@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v8 3/3] drm/xe: Allow scratch page under fault mode for certain platform
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 19:18:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250308001829.1459320-4-oak.zeng@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250308001829.1459320-1-oak.zeng@intel.com>
Normally scratch page is not allowed when a vm is operate under page
fault mode, i.e., in the existing codes, DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE
and DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE are mutual exclusive. The reason
is fault mode relies on recoverable page to work, while scratch page
can mute recoverable page fault.
On xe2 and xe3, out of bound prefetch can cause page fault and further
system hang because xekmd can't resolve such page fault. SYCL and OCL
language runtime requires out of bound prefetch to be silently dropped
without causing any functional problem, thus the existing behavior
doesn't meet language runtime requirement.
At the same time, HW prefetching can cause page fault interrupt. Due to
page fault interrupt overhead (i.e., need Guc and KMD involved to fix
the page fault), HW prefetching can be slowed by many orders of magnitude.
Fix those problems by allowing scratch page under fault mode for xe2 and
xe3. With scratch page in place, HW prefetching could always hit scratch
page instead of causing interrupt.
A side effect is, scratch page could hide application program error.
Application out of bound accesses are hided by scratch page mapping,
instead of get reported to user.
v2: Refine commit message (Thomas)
v3: Move the scratch page flag check to after scratch page wa (Thomas)
v4: drop NEEDS_SCRATCH macro (matt)
Add a comment to DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE
Signed-off-by: Oak Zeng <oak.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 3 ++-
include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
index 3e5dfce6f18a..f33ec3f1ac11 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
@@ -2049,7 +2049,8 @@ int xe_vm_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
return -EINVAL;
if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, args->flags & DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE &&
- args->flags & DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE))
+ args->flags & DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE &&
+ !xe->info.needs_scratch))
return -EINVAL;
if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, !(args->flags & DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_LR_MODE) &&
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
index 616916985e3f..9c08738c3b91 100644
--- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
@@ -917,7 +917,11 @@ struct drm_xe_gem_mmap_offset {
* struct drm_xe_vm_create - Input of &DRM_IOCTL_XE_VM_CREATE
*
* The @flags can be:
- * - %DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE
+ * - %DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE - Map the whole virtual address
+ * space of the VM to scratch page. A vm_bind would overwrite the scratch
+ * page mapping. This flag is mutually exclusive with the
+ * %DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_FAULT_MODE flag, with an exception of on x2 and
+ * xe3 platform.
* - %DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_LR_MODE - An LR, or Long Running VM accepts
* exec submissions to its exec_queues that don't have an upper time
* limit on the job execution time. But exec submissions to these
--
2.26.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-08 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-08 0:18 [PATCH v8 0/3] Allow scratch page under fault mode for certain platform Oak Zeng
2025-03-08 0:18 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] drm/xe: Introduced needs_scratch bit in device descriptor Oak Zeng
2025-03-08 0:18 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] drm/xe: Clear scratch page on vm_bind Oak Zeng
2025-03-08 0:18 ` Oak Zeng [this message]
2025-03-08 1:39 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Allow scratch page under fault mode for certain platform Patchwork
2025-03-08 1:39 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-08 1:40 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-03-08 1:57 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-03-08 1:59 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-08 2:00 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-03-08 2:23 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-01 14:28 ` Zeng, Oak
2025-03-09 20:01 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-04-01 14:28 ` Zeng, Oak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250308001829.1459320-4-oak.zeng@intel.com \
--to=oak.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=Thomas.Hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox