From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/format-helper: fix build
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 11:44:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250402104430.142398-2-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
Build fails with:
error: multiple unsequenced modifications to 'sbuf32'
[-Werror,-Wunsequenced]
264 | le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++),
| ^
265 | le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++),
| ~~
With that move the increment of the sbuf32 pointer to the end of the
loop, instead of inside the array list initializer, where the
order/sequence of the sbuf32 pointer modifications is not defined.
Fixes: 58523a25cbf7 ("drm/format-helper: Optimize 32-to-24-bpp conversion")
Fixes: 3f31a017ddbc ("drm/format-helper: Optimize 32-to-16-bpp conversion")
Fixes: 65931bbc5177 ("drm/format-helper: Optimize 32-to-8-bpp conversion")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_helper.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_helper.c
index fc7347caf600..d36e6cacc575 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_helper.c
@@ -261,10 +261,10 @@ static __always_inline void drm_fb_xfrm_line_32to8(void *dbuf, const void *sbuf,
/* write 4 pixels at once */
while (sbuf32 < ALIGN_DOWN_PIXELS(send32, pixels, 4)) {
u32 pix[4] = {
- le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++),
- le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++),
- le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++),
- le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++),
+ le32_to_cpup(sbuf32),
+ le32_to_cpup(sbuf32 + 1),
+ le32_to_cpup(sbuf32 + 2),
+ le32_to_cpup(sbuf32 + 3),
};
/* write output bytes in reverse order for little endianness */
u32 val32 = xfrm_pixel(pix[0]) |
@@ -272,6 +272,7 @@ static __always_inline void drm_fb_xfrm_line_32to8(void *dbuf, const void *sbuf,
(xfrm_pixel(pix[2]) << 16) |
(xfrm_pixel(pix[3]) << 24);
*dbuf32++ = cpu_to_le32(val32);
+ sbuf32 += ARRAY_SIZE(pix);
}
/* write trailing pixels */
@@ -294,10 +295,10 @@ static __always_inline void drm_fb_xfrm_line_32to16(void *dbuf, const void *sbuf
/* write 4 pixels at once */
while (sbuf32 < ALIGN_DOWN_PIXELS(send32, pixels, 4)) {
u32 pix[4] = {
- le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++),
- le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++),
- le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++),
- le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++),
+ le32_to_cpup(sbuf32),
+ le32_to_cpup(sbuf32 + 1),
+ le32_to_cpup(sbuf32 + 2),
+ le32_to_cpup(sbuf32 + 3),
};
/* write output bytes in reverse order for little endianness */
u64 val64 = ((u64)xfrm_pixel(pix[0])) |
@@ -305,6 +306,7 @@ static __always_inline void drm_fb_xfrm_line_32to16(void *dbuf, const void *sbuf
((u64)xfrm_pixel(pix[2]) << 32) |
((u64)xfrm_pixel(pix[3]) << 48);
*dbuf64++ = cpu_to_le64(val64);
+ sbuf32 += ARRAY_SIZE(pix);
}
#endif
@@ -312,13 +314,14 @@ static __always_inline void drm_fb_xfrm_line_32to16(void *dbuf, const void *sbuf
dbuf32 = (__le32 __force *)dbuf64;
while (sbuf32 < ALIGN_DOWN_PIXELS(send32, pixels, 2)) {
u32 pix[2] = {
- le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++),
- le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++),
+ le32_to_cpup(sbuf32),
+ le32_to_cpup(sbuf32 + 1),
};
/* write output bytes in reverse order for little endianness */
u32 val32 = xfrm_pixel(pix[0]) |
(xfrm_pixel(pix[1]) << 16);
*dbuf32++ = cpu_to_le32(val32);
+ sbuf32 += ARRAY_SIZE(pix);
}
/* write trailing pixel */
@@ -339,10 +342,10 @@ static __always_inline void drm_fb_xfrm_line_32to24(void *dbuf, const void *sbuf
/* write pixels in chunks of 4 */
while (sbuf32 < ALIGN_DOWN_PIXELS(send32, pixels, 4)) {
u32 val24[4] = {
- xfrm_pixel(le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++)),
- xfrm_pixel(le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++)),
- xfrm_pixel(le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++)),
- xfrm_pixel(le32_to_cpup(sbuf32++)),
+ xfrm_pixel(le32_to_cpup(sbuf32)),
+ xfrm_pixel(le32_to_cpup(sbuf32 + 1)),
+ xfrm_pixel(le32_to_cpup(sbuf32 + 2)),
+ xfrm_pixel(le32_to_cpup(sbuf32 + 3)),
};
u32 out32[3] = {
/* write output bytes in reverse order for little endianness */
@@ -363,6 +366,7 @@ static __always_inline void drm_fb_xfrm_line_32to24(void *dbuf, const void *sbuf
*dbuf32++ = cpu_to_le32(out32[0]);
*dbuf32++ = cpu_to_le32(out32[1]);
*dbuf32++ = cpu_to_le32(out32[2]);
+ sbuf32 += ARRAY_SIZE(val24);
}
/* write trailing pixel */
--
2.49.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-02 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-02 10:44 Matthew Auld [this message]
2025-04-02 10:53 ` [PATCH] drm/format-helper: fix build Thomas Zimmermann
2025-04-02 10:56 ` Matthew Auld
2025-04-02 11:52 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2025-04-02 11:52 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-04-02 11:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-04-02 12:10 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-04-02 12:12 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-04-02 12:13 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-04-02 12:34 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-04-02 14:37 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250402104430.142398-2-matthew.auld@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jfalempe@redhat.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox