Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"William Tseng" <william.tseng@intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/xe/sched: stop re-submitting signalled jobs
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 12:36:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250523113608.121553-2-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)

Customer is reporting a really subtle issue where we get random DMAR
faults, hangs and other nasties for kernel migration jobs when stressing
stuff like s2idle/s3/s4. The explosions seems to happen somewhere
after resuming the system with splats looking something like:

PM: suspend exit
rfkill: input handler disabled
xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: Engine reset: engine_class=bcs, logical_mask: 0x2, guc_id=0
xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: Timedout job: seqno=24496, lrc_seqno=24496, guc_id=0, flags=0x13 in no process [-1]
xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: Kernel-submitted job timed out

The likely cause appears to be a race between suspend cancelling the
worker that processes the free_job()'s, such that we still have pending
jobs to be freed after the cancel. Following from this, on resume the
pending_list will now contain at least one already complete job, but it
looks like we call drm_sched_resubmit_jobs(), which will then call
run_job() on everything still on the pending_list. But if the job was
already complete, then all the resources tied to the job, like the bb
itself, any memory that is being accessed, the iommu mappings etc. might
be long gone since those are usually tied to the fence signalling.

This scenario can be seen in ftrace when running a slightly modified
xe_pm (kernel was only modified to inject artificial latency into
free_job to make the race easier to hit):

xe_sched_job_run: dev=0000:00:02.0, fence=0xffff888276cc8540, seqno=0, lrc_seqno=0, gt=0, guc_id=0, batch_addr=0x000000146910 ...
xe_exec_queue_stop:   dev=0000:00:02.0, 3:0x2, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=0, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x13
xe_exec_queue_stop:   dev=0000:00:02.0, 3:0x2, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=1, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x4
xe_exec_queue_stop:   dev=0000:00:02.0, 4:0x1, gt=1, width=1, guc_id=0, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x3
xe_exec_queue_stop:   dev=0000:00:02.0, 1:0x1, gt=1, width=1, guc_id=1, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x3
xe_exec_queue_stop:   dev=0000:00:02.0, 4:0x1, gt=1, width=1, guc_id=2, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x3
xe_exec_queue_resubmit: dev=0000:00:02.0, 3:0x2, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=0, guc_state=0x0, flags=0x13
xe_sched_job_run: dev=0000:00:02.0, fence=0xffff888276cc8540, seqno=0, lrc_seqno=0, gt=0, guc_id=0, batch_addr=0x000000146910 ...
.....
xe_exec_queue_memory_cat_error: dev=0000:00:02.0, 3:0x2, gt=0, width=1, guc_id=0, guc_state=0x3, flags=0x13

So the job_run() is clearly triggered twice, even though the first must
have already signalled to completion during suspend. We can also see a
CAT error after the re-submit.

To prevent this try to call xe_sched_stop() to forcefully remove
anything on the pending_list that has already signalled, before we
re-submit.

Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/4856
Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h
index c250ea773491..9315da58d02d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ static inline void xe_sched_tdr_queue_imm(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
 
 static inline void xe_sched_resubmit_jobs(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
 {
+	xe_sched_stop(sched);
 	drm_sched_resubmit_jobs(&sched->base);
 }
 
-- 
2.49.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-05-23 11:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-23 11:36 Matthew Auld [this message]
2025-05-23 12:34 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/sched: stop re-submitting signalled jobs Patchwork
2025-05-23 12:34 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-05-23 12:35 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-05-23 12:48 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-05-23 12:51 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-05-23 12:53 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-05-23 13:27 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-05-23 23:37 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250523113608.121553-2-matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=william.tseng@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox