From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B81D1C71159 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 02:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF5310E3EB; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 02:08:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="l8iNKa4C"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DAED10E2AB; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 02:08:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1750126114; x=1781662114; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=hkmxoAth24IUQdWeWg/PW1kvEopOf7zFgXKj55VjQDM=; b=l8iNKa4CTW7jGfkyH4hRqtpBYgvA7STYlnKIsxF77ZEThjCp5kwQVFfc 1Zo4aCU/B+HQMUpP5Kd7IhsO9ULXdpW8cQ5LcjgyUtH8R7YaCQMzNbnZy +lkypGpaQePuQvk0pFnl6fViEpF6nNxkkZryHH1UdWs08v5T3tl/fzr/r fJUH26oEzc39TykclkRUzEd4Pn2d0tb1fvCiyfTOEwj2dzWSE2l4i4+Od 95E5sIPzWiHkJ/XO4lOPNe7T2XkxnciCO5FdvhvXyyWXRXZ1iIFKOXPC7 lkjwodZovDg3fCxJ3XAohMo22YB1MfObMdBHXvpiIdlcher+yF1kFOXmy w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: J+9T6E2TQce941cgTqKwkg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 1mG/XBUBRSyzxbIAWV/eeA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11465"; a="52152772" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,242,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="52152772" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jun 2025 19:08:31 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 7FqgPxr3S8OW7DheVNUUYQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: h7mtKchlQ8Op5htLGZgezw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,242,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="149093529" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO e8142ee1dce2) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2025 19:08:29 -0700 Received: from kbuild by e8142ee1dce2 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uRLkQ-000FVc-34; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 02:08:26 +0000 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 10:08:17 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.brost@intel.com, matthew.auld@intel.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] drm/ttm: rename ttm_bo_put to _fini Message-ID: <202506170945.w3e0EBJ6-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250616130726.22863-4-christian.koenig@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250616130726.22863-4-christian.koenig@amd.com> X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" Hi Christian, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on drm-misc/drm-misc-next] [also build test ERROR on next-20250616] [cannot apply to drm-xe/drm-xe-next drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next linus/master drm/drm-next drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes drm-tip/drm-tip v6.16-rc2] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-K-nig/drm-xe-stop-asserting-on-the-TTM-refcount/20250616-210818 base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc drm-misc-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250616130726.22863-4-christian.koenig%40amd.com patch subject: [PATCH 4/6] drm/ttm: rename ttm_bo_put to _fini config: riscv-randconfig-002-20250617 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250617/202506170945.w3e0EBJ6-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: riscv32-linux-gcc (GCC) 10.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250617/202506170945.w3e0EBJ6-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202506170945.w3e0EBJ6-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dma.h:30, from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c:31: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h: In function 'nouveau_bo_fini': >> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h:60:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ttm_bo_put'; did you mean 'ttm_bo_pin'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 60 | ttm_bo_put(&bo->bo); | ^~~~~~~~~~ | ttm_bo_pin cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +60 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h 8be21a6402baa5 Ben Skeggs 2012-07-18 56 bf32a3a1268638 Danilo Krummrich 2024-07-18 57 static inline void bf32a3a1268638 Danilo Krummrich 2024-07-18 58 nouveau_bo_fini(struct nouveau_bo *bo) 8be21a6402baa5 Ben Skeggs 2012-07-18 59 { bf32a3a1268638 Danilo Krummrich 2024-07-18 @60 ttm_bo_put(&bo->bo); 8be21a6402baa5 Ben Skeggs 2012-07-18 61 } 8be21a6402baa5 Ben Skeggs 2012-07-18 62 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki