From: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/alpm: Replace hardcoded LFPS cycle with proper calculation
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:39:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250829053929.3585636-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250829053929.3585636-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Currently LFPS is hadcoded for different port clocks. Replace this with
proper calculation.
v2: replace hardcoded 20 with 2 * LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c | 90 ++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
index ae556a885c2a..b061f7165bba 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
@@ -58,58 +58,43 @@ static int get_silence_period_symbols(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
1000 / 1000;
}
-/*
- * See Bspec: 71632 for the table
- *
- * Half cycle duration:
- *
- * Link rates 1.62 - 4.32 and tLFPS_Cycle = 70 ns
- * FLOOR( (Link Rate * tLFPS_Cycle) / (2 * 10) )
- *
- * Link rates 5.4 - 8.1
- * PORT_ALPM_LFPS_CTL[ LFPS Cycle Count ] = 10
- * LFPS Period chosen is the mid-point of the min:max values from the table
- * FLOOR( LFPS Period in Symbol clocks /
- * (2 * PORT_ALPM_LFPS_CTL[ LFPS Cycle Count ]) )
- */
-static bool _lnl_get_lfps_half_cycle(int link_rate, int *lfps_half_cycle)
+static int get_lfps_cycle_min_max_time(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
+ int *min, int *max)
{
- switch (link_rate) {
- case 162000:
- *lfps_half_cycle = 5;
- break;
- case 216000:
- *lfps_half_cycle = 7;
- break;
- case 243000:
- *lfps_half_cycle = 8;
- break;
- case 270000:
- *lfps_half_cycle = 9;
- break;
- case 324000:
- *lfps_half_cycle = 11;
- break;
- case 432000:
- *lfps_half_cycle = 15;
- break;
- case 540000:
- *lfps_half_cycle = 12;
- break;
- case 648000:
- *lfps_half_cycle = 15;
- break;
- case 675000:
- *lfps_half_cycle = 15;
- break;
- case 810000:
- *lfps_half_cycle = 19;
- break;
- default:
- *lfps_half_cycle = -1;
- return false;
+ if (crtc_state->port_clock < 540000) {
+ *min = 65 * LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT;
+ *max = 75 * LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT;
+ } else if (crtc_state->port_clock <= 810000) {
+ *min = 140;
+ *max = 800;
+ } else {
+ *min = *max = -1;
+ return -1;
}
- return true;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int get_lfps_cycle_time(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+{
+ int tlfps_cycle_min, tlfps_cycle_max, ret;
+
+ ret = get_lfps_cycle_min_max_time(crtc_state, &tlfps_cycle_min,
+ &tlfps_cycle_max);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return tlfps_cycle_min + (tlfps_cycle_max - tlfps_cycle_min) / 2;
+}
+
+static int get_lfps_half_cycle_clocks(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+{
+ int lfps_cycle_time = get_lfps_cycle_time(crtc_state);
+
+ if (lfps_cycle_time < 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ return lfps_cycle_time * crtc_state->port_clock / 1000 / 1000 / (2 * LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT);
}
/*
@@ -161,8 +146,9 @@ _lnl_compute_aux_less_alpm_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
aux_less_wake_lines = intel_usecs_to_scanlines(&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode,
aux_less_wake_time);
silence_period = get_silence_period_symbols(crtc_state);
- if (!_lnl_get_lfps_half_cycle(crtc_state->port_clock,
- &lfps_half_cycle))
+
+ lfps_half_cycle = get_lfps_half_cycle_clocks(crtc_state);
+ if (lfps_half_cycle < 0)
return false;
if (aux_less_wake_lines > ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_MASK ||
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-29 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-29 5:39 [PATCH v2 0/4] ALPM LFPS and silence period calculation Jouni Högander
2025-08-29 5:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/alpm: Calculate silence period Jouni Högander
2025-08-29 5:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/alpm: Add own define for LFPS count Jouni Högander
2025-08-29 5:39 ` Jouni Högander [this message]
2025-08-29 10:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/alpm: Replace hardcoded LFPS cycle with proper calculation Manna, Animesh
2025-08-29 5:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/alpm: Use actual lfps cycle and silence periods in wake time Jouni Högander
2025-08-29 5:48 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for ALPM LFPS and silence period calculation (rev2) Patchwork
2025-08-29 6:36 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-08-29 16:22 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-09-05 6:14 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-09-05 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] ALPM LFPS and silence period calculation Hogander, Jouni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250829053929.3585636-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox