Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com,
	Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] Optimize vrr.guardband
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 15:00:03 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251016093009.2139105-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)

Instead of setting vrr.guardband to vblank, use optimal guardband that
works for most of the cases. This will help in avoiding need of change
in guardband and fix the LRR feature that needs seamless switching to
a lower refresh rate.

-Patch [1-2] are squashed from series [1] and [2] and are not meant for
 review.
-Patch [3-6] are patches to check the guardband for prefill+PSR+SDP
 latencies and to use a static optimized guardband.

[1] "Preparatory patches for guardband optimization"
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/155661/#rev8

[2] "Introduce helpers for prefill latency calculations"
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/155629/#rev3

Rev2:
- Drop patch to check guardband in crtc_check phase, instead check
  guardband for SDP in compute_config_late.
- Modify the helper to get the min sdp guardband if all SDPs are assumed
  to be enabled.
- Rename the helpers to get min guardband for sdp and psr.

Ankit Nautiyal (5):
  [NOT FOR REVIEW] drm/i915/vrr: prep patches for guardband optimization
    squashed
  drm/i915/psr: Add helper to get min psr guardband
  drm/i915/dp: Add helper to get min sdp guardband
  drm/i915/dp: Check if guardband can accommodate sdp latencies
  drm/i915/vrr: Use the min static optimized guardband

Ville Syrjälä (1):
  [NOT FOR REVIEW] drm/i915/prefill: Prefill latency calculations series
    squashed

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile                |   1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c   |  80 +++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h   |   6 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c     |   7 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c |  26 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c      |  69 +++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h      |   5 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c     | 256 +++++++++++++------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h     |   3 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c  |  10 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.h  |   2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c    |   8 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h    |   1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c     |  83 +++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h     |   2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_prefill.c   | 157 ++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_prefill.h   |  46 ++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c    | 141 ++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.h    |  15 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 156 +++++------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h |   3 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile                  |   1 +
 22 files changed, 894 insertions(+), 184 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_prefill.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_prefill.h

-- 
2.45.2


             reply	other threads:[~2025-10-16  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-16  9:30 Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2025-10-16  9:30 ` [PATCH 1/6] [NOT FOR REVIEW] drm/i915/vrr: prep patches for guardband optimization squashed Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-16  9:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] [NOT FOR REVIEW] drm/i915/prefill: Prefill latency calculations series squashed Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-16  9:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/psr: Add helper to get min psr guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-16  9:30 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/dp: Add helper to get min sdp guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-16  9:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/dp: Check if guardband can accommodate sdp latencies Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-16  9:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/vrr: Use the min static optimized guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-16 17:29   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-16 10:31 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Optimize vrr.guardband (rev2) Patchwork
2025-10-16 10:32 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-10-16 10:50 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-10-16 11:25 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-10-17  6:56 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-15 10:22 [PATCH 0/6] Optimize vrr.guardband Ankit Nautiyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251016093009.2139105-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox