From: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
"Michał Wajdeczko" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
"Piotr Piórkowski" <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Satyanarayana K V P" <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 3/4] drm/xe: Assert that VF will never use fixed placement of BOs
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 00:48:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251021224817.1593817-4-tomasz.lis@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251021224817.1593817-1-tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Most BOs do not care at which offset they will be accessed within
GGTT or PPGTT. The few which do care, should be only created
on PF, and mapped within GGTT. On VFs, mapping at fixed offset
is prohibited, as each VF is granted access to a range of
GGTT address space.
Since fixed addresses of GGTT mapping can only be used on PF,
add an assert which makes sure no attempt of fixed placement
will happen for a driver probed on a VF.
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
index cbc3ee157218..8a4010294e39 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
@@ -2276,6 +2276,12 @@ static int __xe_bo_fixed_placement(struct xe_device *xe,
struct ttm_place *place = bo->placements;
u32 vram_flag, vram_stolen_flags;
+ /*
+ * to allow fixed placement in GGTT of a VF, post-migration fixups would have to
+ * include selecting a new fixed offset and shifting the page ranges for it
+ */
+ xe_assert(xe, !IS_SRIOV_VF(xe) || !(bo->flags & XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT));
+
if (flags & (XE_BO_FLAG_USER | XE_BO_FLAG_SYSTEM))
return -EINVAL;
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-21 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-21 22:48 [PATCH v7 0/4] drm/xe/vf: Minor fixes to post-migration recovery Tomasz Lis
2025-10-21 22:48 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] drm/xe/vf: Revert logic of vf.migration.enabled Tomasz Lis
2025-10-21 22:48 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] drm/xe/vf: Fix GuC FW check for VF migration support Tomasz Lis
2025-10-21 22:48 ` Tomasz Lis [this message]
2025-10-21 22:48 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] drm/xe/vf: Do not disable VF migration on ATS-M Tomasz Lis
2025-10-22 0:24 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/vf: Minor fixes to post-migration recovery (rev7) Patchwork
2025-10-22 1:32 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-22 4:15 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-10-22 13:29 ` Lis, Tomasz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251021224817.1593817-4-tomasz.lis@intel.com \
--to=tomasz.lis@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=piotr.piorkowski@intel.com \
--cc=satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox