From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: [CI 07/27] drm/xe/mocs: Use scope-based cleanup
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:43:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251118164338.3572146-36-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251118164338.3572146-29-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Using scope-based cleanup for runtime PM and forcewake in the MOCS code
allows us to eliminate some goto-based error handling and simplify some
other functions.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c | 17 ++++++-----------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c | 18 ++++++------------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c
index 6bb278167aaf..28374330b894 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c
@@ -43,14 +43,12 @@ static void read_l3cc_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
{
struct kunit *test = kunit_get_current_test();
u32 l3cc, l3cc_expected;
- unsigned int fw_ref, i;
+ unsigned int i;
u32 reg_val;
- fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
- if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL)) {
- xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
+ CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
+ if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref.domains, XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL))
KUNIT_FAIL_AND_ABORT(test, "Forcewake Failed.\n");
- }
for (i = 0; i < info->num_mocs_regs; i++) {
if (!(i & 1)) {
@@ -74,7 +72,6 @@ static void read_l3cc_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, l3cc_expected, l3cc,
"l3cc idx=%u has incorrect val.\n", i);
}
- xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
}
static void read_mocs_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
@@ -82,14 +79,14 @@ static void read_mocs_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
{
struct kunit *test = kunit_get_current_test();
u32 mocs, mocs_expected;
- unsigned int fw_ref, i;
+ unsigned int i;
u32 reg_val;
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE_MSG(test, info->unused_entries_index,
"Unused entries index should have been defined\n");
- fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NE_MSG(test, fw_ref, 0, "Forcewake Failed.\n");
+ CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NE_MSG(test, fw_ref.domains, 0, "Forcewake Failed.\n");
for (i = 0; i < info->num_mocs_regs; i++) {
if (regs_are_mcr(gt))
@@ -106,8 +103,6 @@ static void read_mocs_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, mocs_expected, mocs,
"mocs reg 0x%x has incorrect val.\n", i);
}
-
- xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
}
static int mocs_kernel_test_run_device(struct xe_device *xe)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c
index 6613d3b48a84..0b7225bd77e0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c
@@ -811,26 +811,20 @@ int xe_mocs_dump(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
enum xe_force_wake_domains domain;
struct xe_mocs_info table;
- unsigned int fw_ref, flags;
- int err = 0;
+ unsigned int flags;
flags = get_mocs_settings(xe, &table);
domain = flags & HAS_LNCF_MOCS ? XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL : XE_FW_GT;
- xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe);
- fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), domain);
- if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, domain)) {
- err = -ETIMEDOUT;
- goto err_fw;
- }
+ guard(xe_pm_runtime_noresume)(xe);
+ CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), domain);
+ if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref.domains, domain))
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
table.ops->dump(&table, flags, gt, p);
-err_fw:
- xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
- xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
- return err;
+ return 0;
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_KUNIT_TEST)
--
2.51.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-18 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-18 16:43 [CI 00/27] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 01/27] drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 02/27] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 03/27] drm/xe/gt: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 04/27] drm/xe/gt_idle: " Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 05/27] drm/xe/guc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 06/27] drm/xe/guc_pc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 08/27] drm/xe/pat: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 09/27] drm/xe/pxp: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 10/27] drm/xe/gsc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 11/27] drm/xe/device: " Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 12/27] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 13/27] drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 14/27] drm/xe: Return forcewake reference type from force_wake_get_any_engine() Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 15/27] drm/xe/drm_client: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 16/27] drm/xe/gt_debugfs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 17/27] drm/xe/huc: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 18/27] drm/xe/query: " Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 19/27] drm/xe/reg_sr: " Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:43 ` [CI 20/27] drm/xe/vram: " Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:44 ` [CI 21/27] drm/xe/bo: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:44 ` [CI 22/27] drm/xe/ggtt: Use scope-based runtime pm Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:44 ` [CI 23/27] drm/xe/hwmon: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:44 ` [CI 24/27] drm/xe/sriov: " Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:44 ` [CI 25/27] drm/xe/tests: " Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:44 ` [CI 26/27] drm/xe/sysfs: Use scope-based runtime power management Matt Roper
2025-11-18 16:44 ` [CI 27/27] drm/xe/debugfs: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-18 18:08 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM (rev5) Patchwork
2025-11-18 18:10 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-18 18:47 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-19 16:19 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM (rev6) Patchwork
2025-11-19 16:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-19 17:31 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-19 19:57 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-11-19 20:06 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251118164338.3572146-36-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox