From: Nareshkumar Gollakoti <naresh.kumar.g@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: michal.wajdeczko@intel.com, naresh.kumar.g@intel.com
Subject: [V7 PATCH] drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode:Mutual Exclusivity b/w Multi CCS Mode & SRIOV VF Provisioning
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 22:27:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251125165749.2616038-2-naresh.kumar.g@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251015142820.2519054-2-naresh.kumar.g@intel.com>
Use PF lockdown supported functions to enforce mutual exclusivity between
CCS Mode and SRIOV VF enabling/provisioning during CCS Mode enabling.
v2:
- function xe_device_is_vf_enabled has been refactored to
xe_sriov_pf_has_vfs_enabled and moved to xe_sriov_pf_helper.h.
- The code now distinctly checks for SR-IOV VF mode and
SR-IOV PF with VFs enabled.
- Log messages have been updated to explicitly state the current mode.
- The function xe_multi_ccs_mode_enabled is moved to xe_device.h
v3: Described missed arg documentation for xe_sriov_pf_has_vfs_enabled
v4:
- sysfs interface for CCS mode is not initialized
when operating in SRIOV VF Mode.
- xe_sriov_pf_has_vfs_enabled() check is sufficient while CCS mode
enablement.
- remove unnecessary comments as flow is self explanatory.
v5:(review comments from Michal)
- Add xe device level CCS mode block with mutex lock and CCS mode state
- necessesary functions to manage ccs mode state to provide strict mutual
exclusive support b/w CCS mode & SRIOV VF enabling
v6:
- Re modeled implementation based on lockdown the PF using custom guard
supported functions by Michal
v7:
- Corrected patch style as message written as subject
- Used public PF lockdown functions instead internal funcions(Michal)
- Creating CCS Mode entries only on PF Mode
Signed-off-by: Nareshkumar Gollakoti <naresh.kumar.g@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c
index 50fffc9ebf62..468c3a6790d0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include "xe_gt_sysfs.h"
#include "xe_mmio.h"
#include "xe_sriov.h"
+#include "xe_sriov_pf.h"
static void __xe_gt_apply_ccs_mode(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 num_engines)
{
@@ -108,6 +109,29 @@ ccs_mode_show(struct device *kdev,
return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", gt->ccs_mode);
}
+static int xe_gt_prepare_ccs_mode_enabling(struct xe_device *xe,
+ struct xe_gt *gt)
+{
+ /*
+ * The arm guard is only activated during CCS mode enabling,
+ * and this shuould happen when CCS mode is in default mode.
+ * lockdown arm guard ensures there is no VFS enabling
+ * as CCS mode enabling in progress/enabled.
+ */
+ if (!(gt->ccs_mode > 1))
+ return xe_sriov_pf_lockdown(xe);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void xe_gt_finish_ccs_mode_enabling(struct xe_device *xe,
+ struct xe_gt *gt)
+{
+ /* disarm the guard, if CCS mode is reverted to default */
+ if (!(gt->ccs_mode > 1))
+ xe_sriov_pf_end_lockdown(xe);
+}
+
static ssize_t
ccs_mode_store(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr,
const char *buff, size_t count)
@@ -117,15 +141,13 @@ ccs_mode_store(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr,
u32 num_engines, num_slices;
int ret;
- if (IS_SRIOV(xe)) {
- xe_gt_dbg(gt, "Can't change compute mode when running as %s\n",
- xe_sriov_mode_to_string(xe_device_sriov_mode(xe)));
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- }
+ ret = xe_gt_prepare_ccs_mode_enabling(xe, gt);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
ret = kstrtou32(buff, 0, &num_engines);
if (ret)
- return ret;
+ goto err;
/*
* Ensure number of engines specified is valid and there is an
@@ -135,7 +157,8 @@ ccs_mode_store(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr,
if (!num_engines || num_engines > num_slices || num_slices % num_engines) {
xe_gt_dbg(gt, "Invalid compute config, %d engines %d slices\n",
num_engines, num_slices);
- return -EINVAL;
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err;
}
/* CCS mode can only be updated when there are no drm clients */
@@ -143,7 +166,8 @@ ccs_mode_store(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr,
if (!list_empty(&xe->drm.filelist)) {
mutex_unlock(&xe->drm.filelist_mutex);
xe_gt_dbg(gt, "Rejecting compute mode change as there are active drm clients\n");
- return -EBUSY;
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto err;
}
if (gt->ccs_mode != num_engines) {
@@ -155,7 +179,13 @@ ccs_mode_store(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr,
mutex_unlock(&xe->drm.filelist_mutex);
+ xe_gt_finish_ccs_mode_enabling(xe, gt);
+
return count;
+err:
+ xe_gt_finish_ccs_mode_enabling(xe, gt);
+
+ return ret;
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(ccs_mode);
@@ -191,7 +221,7 @@ int xe_gt_ccs_mode_sysfs_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
int err;
- if (!xe_gt_ccs_mode_enabled(gt))
+ if (!xe_gt_ccs_mode_enabled(gt) || IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
return 0;
err = sysfs_create_files(gt->sysfs, gt_ccs_mode_attrs);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-25 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 14:28 [PATCH V5] drm/xe/: Mutual Exclusivity b/w Multi CCS Mode & SRIOV VF Provisioning Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2025-10-15 23:59 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/: Mutual Exclusivity b/w Multi CCS Mode & SRIOV VF Provisioning (rev6) Patchwork
2025-10-16 0:59 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-16 18:21 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-25 16:57 ` Nareshkumar Gollakoti [this message]
2025-11-25 19:13 ` [V7 PATCH] drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode:Mutual Exclusivity b/w Multi CCS Mode & SRIOV VF Provisioning Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-26 12:21 ` Kumar G, Naresh
2025-11-27 16:10 ` [V8 PATCH] drm/xe: Mutual exclusivity between CCS-mode and PF Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2025-11-27 17:02 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-26 1:13 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/: Mutual Exclusivity b/w Multi CCS Mode & SRIOV VF Provisioning (rev7) Patchwork
2025-11-26 2:18 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-26 4:48 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-11-27 16:25 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/: Mutual Exclusivity b/w Multi CCS Mode & SRIOV VF Provisioning (rev8) Patchwork
2025-11-27 17:29 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-27 19:17 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-28 12:38 ` [V9 PATCH] drm/xe: Mutual exclusivity between CCS-mode and PF Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2025-11-28 13:21 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-28 17:10 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] " Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2025-11-28 17:10 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] drm/xe: Fix Prevent VFs from exposing the CCS mode sysfs file Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-01-15 21:53 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-28 17:10 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] drm/xe: Mutual exclusivity between CCS-mode and PF Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-01-15 22:50 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-28 17:16 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] drm/xe:Mutual " Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2025-11-28 17:16 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] drm/xe: Fix Prevent VFs from exposing the CCS mode sysfs file Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2025-11-28 12:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/: Mutual Exclusivity b/w Multi CCS Mode & SRIOV VF Provisioning (rev9) Patchwork
2025-11-28 14:14 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-28 15:49 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251125165749.2616038-2-naresh.kumar.g@intel.com \
--to=naresh.kumar.g@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox