From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [CI 2/4] drm/xe/guc: Introduce GUC_FIRMWARE_VER_AT_LEAST helper
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 19:32:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202512161949.FGqB4Iim-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251215201806.196514-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Hi Michal,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-xe/drm-xe-next]
[also build test ERROR on drm/drm-next drm-i915/for-linux-next drm-i915/for-linux-next-fixes drm-misc/drm-misc-next drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master v6.19-rc1 next-20251216]
[cannot apply to daeinki-drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Michal-Wajdeczko/drm-xe-Introduce-IF_ARGS-macro-utility/20251216-042142
base: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel.git drm-xe-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251215201806.196514-3-michal.wajdeczko%40intel.com
patch subject: [CI 2/4] drm/xe/guc: Introduce GUC_FIRMWARE_VER_AT_LEAST helper
config: sparc-randconfig-001-20251216 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251216/202512161949.FGqB4Iim-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251216/202512161949.FGqB4Iim-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512161949.FGqB4Iim-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_migration.c:20:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_migration.c: In function 'pf_gt_migration_check_support':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h:19:73: error: expected expression before ')' token
#define MAKE_GUC_VER(maj, min, pat) (((maj) << 16) | ((min) << 8) | (pat))
^
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h:23:3: note: in expansion of macro 'MAKE_GUC_VER'
MAKE_GUC_VER(PICK_ARG1(ver), PICK_ARG2(ver), IF_ARGS(PICK_ARG3(ver), 0, PICK_ARG3(ver))))
^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h:30:36: note: in expansion of macro 'MAKE_GUC_VER_ARGS'
xe_guc_fw_version_at_least((guc), MAKE_GUC_VER_ARGS(ver))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_migration.c:1029:7: note: in expansion of macro 'GUC_FIRMWARE_VER_AT_LEAST'
if (!GUC_FIRMWARE_VER_AT_LEAST(>->uc.guc, 70, 54))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c:23:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c: In function 'guc_waklv_init':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h:19:73: error: expected expression before ')' token
#define MAKE_GUC_VER(maj, min, pat) (((maj) << 16) | ((min) << 8) | (pat))
^
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h:23:3: note: in expansion of macro 'MAKE_GUC_VER'
MAKE_GUC_VER(PICK_ARG1(ver), PICK_ARG2(ver), IF_ARGS(PICK_ARG3(ver), 0, PICK_ARG3(ver))))
^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h:30:36: note: in expansion of macro 'MAKE_GUC_VER_ARGS'
xe_guc_fw_version_at_least((guc), MAKE_GUC_VER_ARGS(ver))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c:350:6: note: in expansion of macro 'GUC_FIRMWARE_VER_AT_LEAST'
if (GUC_FIRMWARE_VER_AT_LEAST(>->uc.guc, 70, 44) && XE_GT_WA(gt, 16026508708))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h:19:73: error: expected expression before ')' token
#define MAKE_GUC_VER(maj, min, pat) (((maj) << 16) | ((min) << 8) | (pat))
^
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h:23:3: note: in expansion of macro 'MAKE_GUC_VER'
MAKE_GUC_VER(PICK_ARG1(ver), PICK_ARG2(ver), IF_ARGS(PICK_ARG3(ver), 0, PICK_ARG3(ver))))
^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h:30:36: note: in expansion of macro 'MAKE_GUC_VER_ARGS'
xe_guc_fw_version_at_least((guc), MAKE_GUC_VER_ARGS(ver))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c:353:6: note: in expansion of macro 'GUC_FIRMWARE_VER_AT_LEAST'
if (GUC_FIRMWARE_VER_AT_LEAST(>->uc.guc, 70, 47) && XE_GT_WA(gt, 16026007364)) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +19 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h
dd08ebf6c3525a7 Matthew Brost 2023-03-30 13
4eb0aab6e4434ad Julia Filipchuk 2024-08-02 14 /*
4eb0aab6e4434ad Julia Filipchuk 2024-08-02 15 * GuC version number components are defined to be only 8-bit size,
4eb0aab6e4434ad Julia Filipchuk 2024-08-02 16 * so converting to a 32bit 8.8.8 integer allows simple (and safe)
4eb0aab6e4434ad Julia Filipchuk 2024-08-02 17 * numerical comparisons.
4eb0aab6e4434ad Julia Filipchuk 2024-08-02 18 */
4eb0aab6e4434ad Julia Filipchuk 2024-08-02 @19 #define MAKE_GUC_VER(maj, min, pat) (((maj) << 16) | ((min) << 8) | (pat))
4eb0aab6e4434ad Julia Filipchuk 2024-08-02 20 #define MAKE_GUC_VER_STRUCT(ver) MAKE_GUC_VER((ver).major, (ver).minor, (ver).patch)
9100abdb735432b Michal Wajdeczko 2025-12-15 21 #define MAKE_GUC_VER_ARGS(ver...) \
9100abdb735432b Michal Wajdeczko 2025-12-15 22 (BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(COUNT_ARGS(ver) < 2 || COUNT_ARGS(ver) > 3) + \
9100abdb735432b Michal Wajdeczko 2025-12-15 23 MAKE_GUC_VER(PICK_ARG1(ver), PICK_ARG2(ver), IF_ARGS(PICK_ARG3(ver), 0, PICK_ARG3(ver))))
9100abdb735432b Michal Wajdeczko 2025-12-15 24
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-16 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-15 20:18 [CI 0/4] PF: Add handling for new adverse event thresholds Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-15 20:18 ` [CI 1/4] drm/xe: Introduce IF_ARGS macro utility Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-15 20:18 ` [CI 2/4] drm/xe/guc: Introduce GUC_FIRMWARE_VER_AT_LEAST helper Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-16 11:32 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-12-15 20:18 ` [CI 3/4] drm/xe/pf: Prepare for new threshold KLVs Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-15 20:18 ` [CI 4/4] drm/xe/pf: Add handling for MLRC adverse event threshold Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-16 0:22 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for PF: Add handling for new adverse event thresholds (rev3) Patchwork
2025-12-16 0:23 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-12-16 1:53 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-16 12:20 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202512161949.FGqB4Iim-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox