From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Calvin Owens <calvin@wbinvd.org>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [CI] drm/xe: Don't use absolute path in generated header comment
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 11:54:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251222165441.516102-2-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (raw)
From: Calvin Owens <calvin@wbinvd.org>
Building the XE driver through Yocto throws this QA warning:
WARNING: mc:house:linux-stable-6.17-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: File /usr/src/debug/linux-stable/6.17/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/generated/xe_device_wa_oob.h in package linux-stable-src contains reference to TMPDIR [buildpaths]
WARNING: mc:house:linux-stable-6.17-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: File /usr/src/debug/linux-stable/6.17/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/generated/xe_wa_oob.h in package linux-stable-src contains reference to TMPDIR [buildpaths]
...because the comment at the top of the generated header contains the
absolute path to the rules file at build time:
* This file was generated from rules: /home/calvinow/git/meta-house/build/tmp-house/work-shared/nuc14rvhu7/kernel-source/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_wa_oob.rules
Fix this minor annoyance by putting the basename of the rules file in
the generated comment instead of the absolute path, so the generated
header contents no longer depend on the location of the kernel source.
Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvin@wbinvd.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gen_wa_oob.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gen_wa_oob.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gen_wa_oob.c
index 247e41c1c48d..e7a50b1348b7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gen_wa_oob.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gen_wa_oob.c
@@ -195,7 +195,8 @@ int main(int argc, const char *argv[])
}
}
- fprintf(args[ARGS_CHEADER].f, HEADER, args[ARGS_INPUT].fn, prefix, prefix);
+ fprintf(args[ARGS_CHEADER].f, HEADER, xbasename(args[ARGS_INPUT].fn),
+ prefix, prefix);
ret = parse(args[ARGS_INPUT].f, args[ARGS_CSOURCE].f,
args[ARGS_CHEADER].f, prefix);
--
2.51.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-12-22 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-22 16:54 Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-12-22 23:03 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Don't use absolute path in generated header comment (rev2) Patchwork
2025-12-22 23:04 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-12-22 23:43 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-23 7:18 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251222165441.516102-2-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=calvin@wbinvd.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox