From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3354CC9830A for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 22:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCAE10E009; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 22:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="nRI541Q/"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10BD510E009; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 22:59:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1768604367; x=1800140367; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Qqp+IYbfM+Dtp6kbbFZiO1GXeE5SUcIlw7bci7bAn3Q=; b=nRI541Q/GRsmvLZutp2qgH9Eynl/Gl7zNBGj9qHtMknS4Webh9p5/dBz 0jal3ZmcwiOtHSxlMBPBz7e7eC3wESbxB+bt8YkZBdJ9onpw26plpboZF GZ+KYtHMuXuGnzcjHIcZ7xj1I+YxoaCrQMkTcSUD2fKLzKkyac0Ivmj7P WzTaV2Xv+XGWtUYTia9Zs87Uwy07dXc/clTuVpWgv4l4chW57C154YT2G Wg9frZLtFGHeFdfLhtlQwwSE2iueGjwLoJrFzZl8/qBcEUvy7v/aBIONd Vu06IvoS5EzvOc0PrmTIZ66kPcJBiX9vVPHKFVqIsIa8mcq1eDng1bp+i A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: yLi47fnrQ3uAVmI6+vlGwg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ZrDgKOX2RxeTbH2hxZs91Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11673"; a="80561547" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,232,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="80561547" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jan 2026 14:59:27 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TCx3gd62RYaY4LbefaPv2A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: QMegt+ZVTx663sK5AgfsSA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,232,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="205157453" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 765f4a05e27f) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2026 14:59:25 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 765f4a05e27f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vgsmo-00000000LK8-2Vkt; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 22:59:22 +0000 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 06:59:10 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jani Nikula , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, jani.nikula@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/{i915,xe}/dsb: move DSB buffer to parent interface Message-ID: <202601170636.oVty7fBv-lkp@intel.com> References: <523081095c7da23ce03835687fe6c5cb4ed3c77f.1768575249.git.jani.nikula@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <523081095c7da23ce03835687fe6c5cb4ed3c77f.1768575249.git.jani.nikula@intel.com> X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" Hi Jani, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on drm-i915/for-linux-next] [also build test ERROR on drm-tip/drm-tip next-20260116] [cannot apply to drm-i915/for-linux-next-fixes drm-xe/drm-xe-next linus/master v6.19-rc5] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jani-Nikula/drm-i915-dsb-move-i915-specific-DSB-buffer-implementation-to-i915/20260116-225559 base: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel.git for-linux-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/523081095c7da23ce03835687fe6c5cb4ed3c77f.1768575249.git.jani.nikula%40intel.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/{i915,xe}/dsb: move DSB buffer to parent interface config: i386-randconfig-015-20260117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260117/202601170636.oVty7fBv-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.4.0-5) 12.4.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260117/202601170636.oVty7fBv-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601170636.oVty7fBv-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c: In function 'dsb_buffer_memset': >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c:107:66: error: macro "memset" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3 107 | display->parent->dsb->memset(dsb->dsb_buf, idx, val, size); | ^ In file included from include/linux/string.h:386, from arch/x86/include/asm/page_32.h:18, from arch/x86/include/asm/page.h:14, from arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:20, from arch/x86/include/asm/timex.h:5, from include/linux/timex.h:67, from include/linux/time32.h:13, from include/linux/time.h:60, from include/linux/jiffies.h:10, from include/linux/ktime.h:25, from include/linux/iopoll.h:11, from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c:7: include/linux/fortify-string.h:512: note: macro "memset" defined here 512 | #define memset(p, c, s) __fortify_memset_chk(p, c, s, \ | >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c:107:29: warning: statement with no effect [-Wunused-value] 107 | display->parent->dsb->memset(dsb->dsb_buf, idx, val, size); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~ vim +/memset +107 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c 102 103 static void dsb_buffer_memset(struct intel_dsb *dsb, u32 idx, u32 val, size_t size) 104 { 105 struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(dsb->crtc); 106 > 107 display->parent->dsb->memset(dsb->dsb_buf, idx, val, size); 108 } 109 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki