From: Brian Nguyen <brian3.nguyen@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com, Brian Nguyen <brian3.nguyen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Skip over non leaf pte for PRL generation
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 08:27:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260129082756.1096935-3-brian3.nguyen@intel.com> (raw)
The check using xe_child->base.children was insufficient in determining
if a pte was a leaf node. So explicitly check for if a pte is a leaf
through the bit checks.
Fixes: b912138df299 ("drm/xe: Create page reclaim list on unbind")
v2:
- Remove old assert. (Matt R)
Signed-off-by: Brian Nguyen <brian3.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
index 6703a7049227..b73a356d0fa1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
@@ -1655,7 +1655,7 @@ static int xe_pt_stage_unbind_entry(struct xe_ptw *parent, pgoff_t offset,
XE_WARN_ON(!*child);
XE_WARN_ON(!level);
- /* Check for leaf node */
+ /* Optimistically check for leaf node, may not be guaranteed from children alone */
if (xe_walk->prl && xe_page_reclaim_list_valid(xe_walk->prl) &&
(!xe_child->base.children || !xe_child->base.children[first])) {
struct iosys_map *leaf_map = &xe_child->bo->vmap;
@@ -1675,10 +1675,13 @@ static int xe_pt_stage_unbind_entry(struct xe_ptw *parent, pgoff_t offset,
break;
}
- /* Ensure it is a defined page */
- xe_tile_assert(xe_walk->tile,
- xe_child->level == 0 ||
- (pte & (XE_PTE_PS64 | XE_PDE_PS_2M | XE_PDPE_PS_1G)));
+ /*
+ * The check for xe_pt's children is insufficient to determine leaf.
+ * If not leaf, break out and continue in next page walk level.
+ */
+ if (xe_child->level > 0 &&
+ !(pte & (XE_PTE_PS64 | XE_PDE_PS_2M | XE_PDPE_PS_1G)))
+ break;
/* An entry should be added for 64KB but contigious 4K have XE_PTE_PS64 */
if (pte & XE_PTE_PS64)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-01-29 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-29 8:27 Brian Nguyen [this message]
2026-01-29 8:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Move page reclaim done_handler to own func Brian Nguyen
2026-01-29 21:40 ` Lin, Shuicheng
2026-02-23 22:45 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-02-23 22:51 ` Matthew Brost
2026-01-29 9:14 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe: Skip over non leaf pte for PRL generation Patchwork
2026-01-29 9:48 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-02-23 21:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Nguyen, Brian3
2026-02-23 22:49 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-02-23 22:59 ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-23 23:07 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-02-23 23:33 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2026-02-24 1:45 ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-24 2:02 ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-25 6:45 ` Nguyen, Brian3
2026-02-25 7:19 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260129082756.1096935-3-brian3.nguyen@intel.com \
--to=brian3.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox