From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>,
matthew.auld@intel.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, alexander.deucher@amd.com,
Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/buddy: Add KUnit test for offset-aligned allocations
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 03:23:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202602100334.WD4wuI8R-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260209083051.13376-2-Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>
Hi Arunpravin,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on 9d757669b2b22cd224c334924f798393ffca537c]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Arunpravin-Paneer-Selvam/drm-buddy-Add-KUnit-test-for-offset-aligned-allocations/20260209-163512
base: 9d757669b2b22cd224c334924f798393ffca537c
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260209083051.13376-2-Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam%40amd.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/buddy: Add KUnit test for offset-aligned allocations
config: m68k-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260210/202602100334.WD4wuI8R-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260210/202602100334.WD4wuI8R-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602100334.WD4wuI8R-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c: In function 'gpu_test_buddy_subtree_offset_alignment_stress':
>> drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c:46:49: error: macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE' passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2
46 | "buddy_init failed\n");
| ^
In file included from drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c:7:
include/kunit/test.h:1390:9: note: macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE' defined here
1390 | #define KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, condition) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c:45:9: error: 'KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'KUNIT_ASSERTION'?
45 | KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, gpu_buddy_init(&mm, mm_size, SZ_4K),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| KUNIT_ASSERTION
drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c:45:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
vim +/KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE +46 drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c
23
24 static void gpu_test_buddy_subtree_offset_alignment_stress(struct kunit *test)
25 {
26 struct gpu_buddy_block *block;
27 struct rb_node *node = NULL;
28 const u64 mm_size = SZ_2M;
29 const u64 alignments[] = {
30 SZ_1M,
31 SZ_512K,
32 SZ_256K,
33 SZ_128K,
34 SZ_64K,
35 SZ_32K,
36 SZ_16K,
37 SZ_8K,
38 };
39
40 struct list_head allocated[ARRAY_SIZE(alignments)];
41 unsigned int i, order, max_subtree_align = 0;
42 struct gpu_buddy mm;
43 int ret, tree;
44
> 45 KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, gpu_buddy_init(&mm, mm_size, SZ_4K),
> 46 "buddy_init failed\n");
47
48 for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(allocated); i++)
49 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&allocated[i]);
50
51 /*
52 * Exercise subtree_max_alignment tracking by allocating blocks with descending
53 * alignment constraints and freeing them in reverse order. This verifies that
54 * free-tree augmentation correctly propagates the maximum offset alignment
55 * present in each subtree at every stage.
56 */
57
58 for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(alignments); i++) {
59 struct gpu_buddy_block *root = NULL;
60 unsigned int expected;
61 u64 align;
62
63 align = alignments[i];
64 expected = ilog2(align) - 1;
65
66 for (;;) {
67 ret = gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm,
68 0, mm_size,
69 SZ_4K, align,
70 &allocated[i],
71 0);
72 if (ret)
73 break;
74
75 block = list_last_entry(&allocated[i],
76 struct gpu_buddy_block,
77 link);
78 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, gpu_buddy_block_offset(block) & (align - 1), 0ULL);
79 }
80
81 for (order = mm.max_order + 1; order-- > 0 && !root; ) {
82 for (tree = 0; tree < 2; tree++) {
83 node = mm.free_trees[tree][order].rb_node;
84 if (node) {
85 root = container_of(node,
86 struct gpu_buddy_block,
87 rb);
88 break;
89 }
90 }
91 }
92
93 KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, root);
94 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, root->subtree_max_alignment, expected);
95 }
96
97 for (i = ARRAY_SIZE(alignments); i-- > 0; ) {
98 gpu_buddy_free_list(&mm, &allocated[i], 0);
99
100 for (order = 0; order <= mm.max_order; order++) {
101 for (tree = 0; tree < 2; tree++) {
102 node = mm.free_trees[tree][order].rb_node;
103 if (!node)
104 continue;
105
106 block = container_of(node, struct gpu_buddy_block, rb);
107 max_subtree_align = max(max_subtree_align, block->subtree_max_alignment);
108 }
109 }
110
111 KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, max_subtree_align, ilog2(alignments[i]));
112 }
113
114 gpu_buddy_fini(&mm);
115 }
116
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-09 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-09 8:30 [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/buddy: Improve offset-aligned allocation handling Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2026-02-09 8:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/buddy: Add KUnit test for offset-aligned allocations Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2026-02-09 19:23 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-02-09 19:26 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-09 21:20 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-09 8:37 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for series starting with [v3,1/2] drm/buddy: Improve offset-aligned allocation handling Patchwork
2026-02-09 8:39 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-02-09 8:57 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2026-02-09 9:16 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2026-02-09 10:21 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-02-10 16:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Matthew Auld
2026-02-17 6:03 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2026-02-17 10:01 ` Matthew Auld
2026-02-17 10:16 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202602100334.WD4wuI8R-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox