From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57384EEA870 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0216910E778; Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="CiPfWh6X"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 606DC10E77B for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:09:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770941376; x=1802477376; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KLkqeZqhJTIwqUTdrvH5wCtKWM6VQ9+70o/yb64CoFo=; b=CiPfWh6XHEqaOZ+Wj57ilsQqXJXb0UFfeOitPLWIo+et28NAugMIZqDe 6zwZxXzw5fLBbdD5pFNXz8jrpUu5U333LejnSu583lvLvkWFbKv3QYHUb CwVeTUn9KPRMFZ+sXQWOy6Y+sVVDb2x1ZS7w5XuMtDJnGTgor+rSLhcp9 VV/M8YbD0dP+LXLjTNv5A4mSSKEVJJMZR6tpse9EqsleHBadvFB6mqh1b iF5RXlPGWrZQGatDzowDmuJTtplluRC2p4tyjjlh+cV0v5RJFt9LWYZEU 3DOoIbS/vngC3Jtxjk8W4dXnTcKrq2svcO5FyS/4Xez7xi7SkRe6/Ciur g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vL4fuFBTRx6jJkjX+ifkiA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Nyi1E7ElRjq5isfjhKrQDQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11699"; a="94764101" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,287,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="94764101" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Feb 2026 16:09:36 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ql5ulol6Sw2YllFnBiSbYg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Imwl/PuvT2Cd3xSAdgwBdw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,287,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="212595836" Received: from mdroper-desk1.fm.intel.com ([10.1.39.133]) by orviesa009-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Feb 2026 16:09:36 -0800 From: Matt Roper To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/xe/reg_sr: Allow register_save_restore_check debugfs to verify LRC values Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 16:09:34 -0800 Message-ID: <20260213000929.732113-10-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <20260213000929.732113-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> References: <20260213000929.732113-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Xe graphics driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-xe" reg_sr programming that applies to an engines LRC cannot be verified by a simple CPU-based register readout because the reg_sr's values may not be in effect if no context is executing on the hardware at the time we check. Instead, we should verify correct reg_sr application by searching for the register in the default_lrc. Signed-off-by: Matt Roper --- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.h | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c index aa43427a9f4b..f45306308cd6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c @@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ static int register_save_restore_check(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p) xe_reg_sr_readback_check(>->reg_sr, gt, p); for_each_hw_engine(hwe, gt, id) xe_reg_sr_readback_check(&hwe->reg_sr, gt, p); - - /* TODO: Check hwe->reg_lrc against contents of default_lrc. */ + for_each_hw_engine(hwe, gt, id) + xe_reg_sr_lrc_check(&hwe->reg_lrc, gt, hwe, p); return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.c index 75aa4426b3ec..27a9447a672b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include "xe_gt_printk.h" #include "xe_gt_types.h" #include "xe_hw_engine_types.h" +#include "xe_lrc.h" #include "xe_mmio.h" #include "xe_rtp_types.h" @@ -242,3 +243,31 @@ void xe_reg_sr_readback_check(struct xe_reg_sr *sr, offset, mask, entry->set_bits, val & mask); } } + +/** + * xe_reg_sr_lrc_check() - Check LRC for registers referenced in save/restore + * entries and check whether the programming is in place. + * @sr: Save/restore entries + * @gt: GT to read register from + * @p: DRM printer to report discrepancies on + */ +void xe_reg_sr_lrc_check(struct xe_reg_sr *sr, + struct xe_gt *gt, + struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, + struct drm_printer *p) +{ + struct xe_reg_sr_entry *entry; + unsigned long offset; + + xa_for_each(&sr->xa, offset, entry) { + u32 val; + int ret = xe_lrc_lookup_default_reg_value(gt, hwe->class, offset, &val); + u32 mask = entry->clr_bits | entry->set_bits; + + if (ret == -ENOENT) + drm_printf(p, "%#8lx :: not found in LRC for %s\n", offset, hwe->name); + else if ((val & mask) != entry->set_bits) + drm_printf(p, "%#8lx & %#10x :: expected %#10x got %#10x\n", + offset, mask, entry->set_bits, val & mask); + } +} diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.h index cd133a09aa9b..1ec6e8ecf278 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.h @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ void xe_reg_sr_dump(struct xe_reg_sr *sr, struct drm_printer *p); void xe_reg_sr_readback_check(struct xe_reg_sr *sr, struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p); +void xe_reg_sr_lrc_check(struct xe_reg_sr *sr, + struct xe_gt *gt, + struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, + struct drm_printer *p); int xe_reg_sr_add(struct xe_reg_sr *sr, const struct xe_reg_sr_entry *e, struct xe_gt *gt); -- 2.53.0