Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Nguyen <brian3.nguyen@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Brian Nguyen <brian3.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] drm/xe: Skip over non leaf pte for PRL generation
Date: Thu,  5 Mar 2026 17:15:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260305171546.67691-6-brian3.nguyen@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260305171546.67691-5-brian3.nguyen@intel.com>

The check using xe_child->base.children was insufficient in determining
if a pte was a leaf node. So explicitly skip over every non-leaf pt and
conditionally abort if there is a scenario where a non-leaf pt is
interleaved between leaf pt, which results in the page walker skipping
over some leaf pt.

Note that the behavior being targeted for abort is
PD[0] = 2M PTE
PD[1] = PT -> 512 4K PTEs
PD[2] = 2M PTE

results in abort, page walker won't descend PD[1].

With new abort, ensuring valid PRL before handling a second abort.

v2:
 - Revert to previous assert.
 - Revised non-leaf handling for interleaf child pt and leaf pte.
 - Update comments to specifications. (Stuart)
 - Remove unnecessary XE_PTE_PS64. (Matthew B)

v3:
 - Modify secondary abort to only check non-leaf PTEs. (Matthew B)

Fixes: b912138df299 ("drm/xe: Create page reclaim list on unbind")
Signed-off-by: Brian Nguyen <brian3.nguyen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
index 13b355fadd58..2d9ce2c4cb4f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
@@ -1655,14 +1655,35 @@ static int xe_pt_stage_unbind_entry(struct xe_ptw *parent, pgoff_t offset,
 	XE_WARN_ON(!level);
 	/* Check for leaf node */
 	if (xe_walk->prl && xe_page_reclaim_list_valid(xe_walk->prl) &&
-	    (!xe_child->base.children || !xe_child->base.children[first])) {
+	    xe_child->level <= MAX_HUGEPTE_LEVEL) {
 		struct iosys_map *leaf_map = &xe_child->bo->vmap;
 		pgoff_t count = xe_pt_num_entries(addr, next, xe_child->level, walk);
 
 		for (pgoff_t i = 0; i < count; i++) {
-			u64 pte = xe_map_rd(xe, leaf_map, (first + i) * sizeof(u64), u64);
+			u64 pte;
 			int ret;
 
+			/*
+			 * If not a leaf pt, skip unless non-leaf pt is interleaved between
+			 * leaf ptes which causes the page walk to skip over the child leaves
+			 */
+			if (xe_child->base.children && xe_child->base.children[first + i]) {
+				u64 pt_size = 1ULL << walk->shifts[xe_child->level];
+				bool edge_pt = (i == 0 && !IS_ALIGNED(addr, pt_size)) ||
+					       (i == count - 1 && !IS_ALIGNED(next, pt_size));
+
+				if (!edge_pt) {
+					xe_page_reclaim_list_abort(xe_walk->tile->primary_gt,
+								   xe_walk->prl,
+								   "PT is skipped by walk at level=%u offset=%lu",
+								   xe_child->level, first + i);
+					break;
+				}
+				continue;
+			}
+
+			pte = xe_map_rd(xe, leaf_map, (first + i) * sizeof(u64), u64);
+
 			/*
 			 * In rare scenarios, pte may not be written yet due to racy conditions.
 			 * In such cases, invalidate the PRL and fallback to full PPC invalidation.
@@ -1674,9 +1695,8 @@ static int xe_pt_stage_unbind_entry(struct xe_ptw *parent, pgoff_t offset,
 			}
 
 			/* Ensure it is a defined page */
-			xe_tile_assert(xe_walk->tile,
-				       xe_child->level == 0 ||
-				       (pte & (XE_PTE_PS64 | XE_PDE_PS_2M | XE_PDPE_PS_1G)));
+			xe_tile_assert(xe_walk->tile, xe_child->level == 0 ||
+				       (pte & (XE_PDE_PS_2M | XE_PDPE_PS_1G)));
 
 			/* An entry should be added for 64KB but contigious 4K have XE_PTE_PS64 */
 			if (pte & XE_PTE_PS64)
@@ -1701,11 +1721,11 @@ static int xe_pt_stage_unbind_entry(struct xe_ptw *parent, pgoff_t offset,
 	killed = xe_pt_check_kill(addr, next, level - 1, xe_child, action, walk);
 
 	/*
-	 * Verify PRL is active and if entry is not a leaf pte (base.children conditions),
-	 * there is a potential need to invalidate the PRL if any PTE (num_live) are dropped.
+	 * Verify if any PTE are potentially dropped at non-leaf levels, either from being
+	 * killed or the page walk covers the region.
 	 */
-	if (xe_walk->prl && level > 1 && xe_child->num_live &&
-	    xe_child->base.children && xe_child->base.children[first]) {
+	if (xe_walk->prl && xe_page_reclaim_list_valid(xe_walk->prl) &&
+	    xe_child->level > MAX_HUGEPTE_LEVEL && xe_child->num_live) {
 		bool covered = xe_pt_covers(addr, next, xe_child->level, &xe_walk->base);
 
 		/*
-- 
2.43.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-05 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-05 17:15 [PATCH v4 0/3] Page Reclamation Fixes Brian Nguyen
2026-03-05 17:15 ` Brian Nguyen [this message]
2026-03-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/xe: Move page reclaim done_handler to own func Brian Nguyen
2026-03-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/xe: Skip adding PRL entry to NULL VMA Brian Nguyen
2026-03-06 15:33 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Page Reclamation Fixes (rev4) Patchwork
2026-03-06 16:36 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-03-07  1:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Page Reclamation Fixes (rev5) Patchwork
2026-03-07  2:46 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-08  5:33 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-03-11 18:14   ` Nguyen, Brian
2026-03-16 16:44     ` Matt Roper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260305171546.67691-6-brian3.nguyen@intel.com \
    --to=brian3.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox