From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 04/12] drm/xe: Issue GGTT invalidation under lock in ggtt_node_remove
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 21:32:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260316043255.226352-5-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260316043255.226352-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Async work (e.g., GuC queue teardowns) can call ggtt_node_remove, so the
operation must be performed under the GGTT lock to ensure the GGTT
online check remains stable. GGTT insertion and removal are heavyweight
operations (e.g., queue create/destroy), so the additional serialization
cost is negligible compared to ensuring correctness.
Fixes: 4f3a998a173b ("drm/xe: Open-code GGTT MMIO access protection")
Signed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
index 017f679ba13f..353b324f7301 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
@@ -482,15 +482,10 @@ static void ggtt_node_remove(struct xe_ggtt_node *node)
xe_ggtt_clear(ggtt, xe_ggtt_node_addr(node), xe_ggtt_node_size(node));
drm_mm_remove_node(&node->base);
node->base.size = 0;
- mutex_unlock(&ggtt->lock);
-
- if (!bound)
- goto free_node;
-
- if (node->invalidate_on_remove)
+ if (bound && node->invalidate_on_remove)
xe_ggtt_invalidate(ggtt);
+ mutex_unlock(&ggtt->lock);
-free_node:
ggtt_node_fini(node);
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-16 4:32 [RFC PATCH 00/12] Introduce DRM dep queue Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] workqueue: Add interface to teach lockdep to warn on reclaim violations Matthew Brost
2026-03-25 15:59 ` Tejun Heo
2026-03-26 1:49 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-26 2:19 ` Tejun Heo
2026-03-27 4:33 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-27 17:25 ` Tejun Heo
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] drm/dep: Add DRM dependency queue layer Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 9:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-17 5:22 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 8:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-16 10:25 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-03-17 5:10 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 12:19 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-03-18 23:02 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 2:47 ` Daniel Almeida
2026-03-17 5:45 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 7:17 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-03-17 8:26 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 12:04 ` Daniel Almeida
2026-03-17 19:41 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-03-23 17:31 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-23 17:42 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-03-17 18:14 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 19:48 ` Daniel Almeida
2026-03-17 20:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-18 22:40 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-19 9:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-22 6:43 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-23 7:58 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-23 10:06 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-23 17:11 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 12:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-03-17 14:25 ` Daniel Almeida
2026-03-17 14:33 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-03-18 22:50 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 8:47 ` Christian König
2026-03-17 14:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-18 23:28 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-19 9:11 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-23 4:50 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-23 9:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-23 17:08 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-23 18:38 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-24 9:23 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-24 16:06 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-25 2:33 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-24 8:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-24 16:51 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-17 16:30 ` Shashank Sharma
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] drm/xe: Use WQ_MEM_WARN_ON_RECLAIM on all workqueues in the reclaim path Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-03-26 5:45 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] drm/xe: Issue GGTT invalidation under lock in ggtt_node_remove Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] drm/xe: Return fence from xe_sched_job_arm and adjust job references Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] drm/xe: Convert to DRM dep queue scheduler layer Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] drm/xe: Make scheduler message lock IRQ-safe Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] drm/xe: Rework exec queue object on top of DRM dep Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] drm/xe: Enable IRQ job put in " Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] drm/xe: Use DRM dep queue kill semantics Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] accel/amdxdna: Convert to drm_dep scheduler layer Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:32 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] drm/panthor: " Matthew Brost
2026-03-16 4:52 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce DRM dep queue Patchwork
2026-03-16 4:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-03-16 5:28 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-16 8:09 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260316043255.226352-5-matthew.brost@intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox