From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.brost@intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, riana.tauro@intel.com,
michal.wajdeczko@intel.com, matthew.d.roper@intel.com,
michal.winiarski@intel.com, matthew.auld@intel.com,
maarten@lankhorst.se, jani.nikula@intel.com,
lukasz.laguna@intel.com, zhanjun.dong@intel.com,
Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/9] drm/xe: Introduce xe_device_assert_lmem_ready()
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2026 02:06:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260327203620.809353-6-raag.jadav@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260327203620.809353-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>
In preparation of usecases which require verifying LMEM readiness after
PCIe FLR, introduce xe_device_assert_lmem_ready() helper.
Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
---
v2: Add kernel doc (Matthew Brost)
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 10 ++++++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
index 9b0540e3e289..7e58b01dfb9b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
@@ -648,7 +648,13 @@ static int xe_set_dma_info(struct xe_device *xe)
return err;
}
-static void assert_lmem_ready(struct xe_device *xe)
+/**
+ * xe_device_assert_lmem_ready() - Verify LMEM readiness
+ * @xe: xe device instance
+ *
+ * Verify LMEM readiness and assert on failure.
+ */
+void xe_device_assert_lmem_ready(struct xe_device *xe)
{
if (!IS_DGFX(xe) || IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
return;
@@ -736,7 +742,7 @@ int xe_device_probe_early(struct xe_device *xe)
* is flagged after full initialization is complete. Assert if lmem is
* not initialized.
*/
- assert_lmem_ready(xe);
+ xe_device_assert_lmem_ready(xe);
xe->wedged.mode = xe_device_validate_wedged_mode(xe, xe_modparam.wedged_mode) ?
XE_DEFAULT_WEDGED_MODE : xe_modparam.wedged_mode;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
index e4b9de8d8e95..6e9a478c3b7a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ static inline struct xe_force_wake *gt_to_fw(struct xe_gt *gt)
return >->pm.fw;
}
+void xe_device_assert_lmem_ready(struct xe_device *xe);
void xe_device_assert_mem_access(struct xe_device *xe);
static inline bool xe_device_has_flat_ccs(struct xe_device *xe)
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-27 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-27 20:36 [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce Xe PCIe FLR Raag Jadav
2026-03-27 20:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] drm/xe/uc_fw: Allow re-initializing firmware Raag Jadav
2026-03-27 20:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] drm/xe/guc_submit: Introduce xe_guc_submit_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-03-27 22:11 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-27 22:12 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-27 20:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] drm/xe/gt: Introduce FLR helpers Raag Jadav
2026-03-27 20:36 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] drm/xe/irq: Introduce xe_irq_disable() Raag Jadav
2026-03-27 20:36 ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2026-03-27 20:36 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] drm/xe/bo_evict: Introduce xe_bo_restore_map() Raag Jadav
2026-03-27 20:36 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] drm/xe/exec_queue: Introduce xe_exec_queue_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-03-27 20:36 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] drm/xe/migrate: Introduce xe_migrate_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-03-27 20:36 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] drm/xe/pci: Introduce PCIe FLR Raag Jadav
2026-03-27 21:00 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-28 4:46 ` Raag Jadav
2026-03-27 22:06 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce Xe PCIe FLR (rev4) Patchwork
2026-03-27 22:07 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-03-27 22:56 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-28 17:07 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260327203620.809353-6-raag.jadav@intel.com \
--to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=lukasz.laguna@intel.com \
--cc=maarten@lankhorst.se \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox