From: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, uma.shankar@intel.com,
jani.nikula@intel.com, Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC]: drm/i915/display: Use ceiling division for NV12 UV surface offset calculation
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 05:45:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260415001553.181329-1-vidya.srinivas@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260411171521.162189-1-vidya.srinivas@intel.com>
For LNL+, odd source size and panning for YUV 422/420 surfaces is
supported. However, it requires the UV (chroma) surface Start X/Y and
width/height to be calculated as ceiling(half of Y plane value) rather
than floor.
The current code uses (>> 17) which combines the U16.16 fixed-point to
integer conversion (>> 16) with a divide-by-2 for chroma subsampling
(>> 1) into a single floor division. For odd Y plane values this
produces an off-by-one error in the UV plane offset.
On Android systems we see PLANE ATS fault when NV12 overlays are
used with odd source dimensions:
[ 126.854200] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_atomic_setup_scaler [xe]] [CRTC:148:pipe A] attached scaler id 0.0 to PLANE:33
[ 126.854617] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm:skl_update_scaler [xe]] [CRTC:148:pipe A] scaler_user index 0.0: staged scaling request for 1279x719->1340x753
[ 126.854837] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_plane_atomic_check [xe]] UV plane [PLANE:33:plane 1A] using Y plane [PLANE:123:plane 4A]
[ 126.854926] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* [CRTC:148:pipe A] PLANE ATS fault
With Y plane width 1279:
floor(1279/2) = 639 (current)
ceil(1279/2) = 640 (required)
Use DIV_ROUND_UP(value, 1 << 17) for the ceiling division of the
U16.16 fixed-point source coordinates, preserving sub-pixel precision.
This is a no-op for even values since ceiling and floor are equal
when the dividend is even.
v2: Use DIV_ROUND_UP(value, 1 << 17) to preserve sub-pixel precision
while making the ceiling division readable (Jani, Uma)
Signed-off-by: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
index 7a9d494334b5..1de79ff65253 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
@@ -2139,10 +2139,16 @@ static int skl_check_nv12_aux_surface(struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
int min_height = intel_plane_min_height(plane, fb, uv_plane, rotation);
int max_width = intel_plane_max_width(plane, fb, uv_plane, rotation);
int max_height = intel_plane_max_height(plane, fb, uv_plane, rotation);
- int x = plane_state->uapi.src.x1 >> 17;
- int y = plane_state->uapi.src.y1 >> 17;
- int w = drm_rect_width(&plane_state->uapi.src) >> 17;
- int h = drm_rect_height(&plane_state->uapi.src) >> 17;
+
+ /*
+ * LNL+ UV surface start/size =
+ * ceiling(half of Y plane start/size). Use ceiling division
+ * unconditionally; it is a no-op for even values.
+ */
+ int x = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_state->uapi.src.x1, 1 << 17);
+ int y = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_state->uapi.src.y1, 1 << 17);
+ int w = DIV_ROUND_UP(drm_rect_width(&plane_state->uapi.src), 1 << 17);
+ int h = DIV_ROUND_UP(drm_rect_height(&plane_state->uapi.src), 1 << 17);
u32 offset;
/* FIXME not quite sure how/if these apply to the chroma plane */
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-11 17:15 [PATCH] [RFC]: drm/i915/display: Use ceiling division for NV12 UV surface offset calculation Vidya Srinivas
2026-04-11 17:27 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for : " Patchwork
2026-04-11 18:14 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-11 19:03 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-14 15:42 ` [PATCH] [RFC]: " Jani Nikula
2026-04-14 17:10 ` Srinivas, Vidya
2026-04-14 17:59 ` Shankar, Uma
2026-04-15 0:23 ` Srinivas, Vidya
2026-04-15 0:15 ` Vidya Srinivas [this message]
2026-04-15 11:59 ` Jani Nikula
2026-04-15 17:06 ` Srinivas, Vidya
2026-04-17 2:03 ` Srinivas, Vidya
2026-04-15 1:10 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for : drm/i915/display: Use ceiling division for NV12 UV surface offset calculation (rev2) Patchwork
2026-04-15 2:10 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-15 3:01 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-15 16:58 ` [PATCH] [RFC v3]: drm/i915/display: Use ceiling division for NV12 UV surface offset calculation Vidya Srinivas
2026-04-29 11:07 ` Juha-Pekka Heikkilä
2026-04-29 11:08 ` Srinivas, Vidya
2026-04-15 17:09 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for : drm/i915/display: Use ceiling division for NV12 UV surface offset calculation (rev3) Patchwork
2026-04-15 17:11 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-04-15 18:08 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-15 20:00 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260415001553.181329-1-vidya.srinivas@intel.com \
--to=vidya.srinivas@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox