From: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, uma.shankar@intel.com,
ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, seanpaul@google.com,
navaremanasi@google.com, shawn.c.lee@intel.com,
Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC]: drm/i915/display: Fix vblank timestamps for fixed RR on VRR-TG-always platforms
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 18:14:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260417124439.206962-1-vidya.srinivas@intel.com> (raw)
On LNL+ VRR timing generator is always active.
For panels like this
"2880x1800": 120 709633 2880 2888 2920 3080 1800 1880 1896 1920 0x48 0xa
"2880x1800": 60 709633 2880 2888 2920 3080 1800 3800 3816 3840 0x40 0xa
that use the same pixel clock with a stretched vtotal have a large front
porch. For this case 2880x1800 panel:
120Hz: vtotal=1920 (120 lines of front porch)
60Hz: vtotal=3840 (2000 lines of front porch)
When at lower RR (60Hz) and "vrr_enable = false" this issue was seen
The intel_crtc_active_timings() function is not adjusting
crtc_vblank_start for the VRR TG when vrr_enable=false, leaving it at
the raw mode value of 1800 (vactive end). Since the VRR TG counts all
the way to vtotal=3840, the actual frame latch happens at line 3840
(16.67ms), but the vblank timestamp was reported at line 1800 (7.8ms).
This caused Android SurfaceFlinger to miscalculate frame deadlines --
it received fence signals ~8ms into the 16.67ms frame and concluded
frames were being presented late, leading to dropped frames during
heavy workloads like video playback at 60Hz.
Fix by adjusting crtc_vblank_start, crtc_vblank_end, and crtc_vtotal
to match the VRR timing generator values when
intel_vrr_always_use_vrr_tg() is true, even when vrr_enable is false.
Signed-off-by: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
index 0726a2abed38..8e0798277d5e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
@@ -527,8 +527,26 @@ static void intel_crtc_active_timings(struct drm_display_mode *mode,
drm_mode_init(mode, &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode);
*vmax_vblank_start = 0;
- if (!vrr_enable)
+ if (!vrr_enable) {
+ /*
+ * On platforms that always use the VRR timing generator
+ * LNL+, even fixed refresh rate modes run
+ * through the VRR TG. The actual frame boundary is at
+ * flipline (= vtotal), not at vactive end. Without this
+ * adjustment, vblank timestamps and flip-done fences are
+ * signaled at vactive end (line 1800 for 60Hz) instead of
+ * near the real frame boundary, causing
+ * compositors like SurfaceFlinger to see ~8ms late fences
+ * and drop frames during GPU-heavy workloads.
+ */
+ if (intel_vrr_always_use_vrr_tg(to_intel_display(crtc_state))) {
+ mode->crtc_vtotal = intel_vrr_vmin_vtotal(crtc_state);
+ mode->crtc_vblank_end = intel_vrr_vmin_vtotal(crtc_state);
+ mode->crtc_vblank_start =
+ intel_vrr_vmin_vblank_start(crtc_state);
+ }
return;
+ }
mode->crtc_vtotal = intel_vrr_vmax_vtotal(crtc_state);
mode->crtc_vblank_end = intel_vrr_vmax_vtotal(crtc_state);
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-17 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-17 12:44 Vidya Srinivas [this message]
2026-04-17 15:42 ` [PATCH] [RFC]: drm/i915/display: Fix vblank timestamps for fixed RR on VRR-TG-always platforms Ville Syrjälä
2026-04-22 4:18 ` Srinivas, Vidya
2026-04-20 16:15 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for : " Patchwork
2026-04-20 17:24 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-20 20:19 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260417124439.206962-1-vidya.srinivas@intel.com \
--to=vidya.srinivas@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=navaremanasi@google.com \
--cc=seanpaul@google.com \
--cc=shawn.c.lee@intel.com \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox