Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
	"Michał Wajdeczko" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
	"Piotr Piórkowski" <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>,
	"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] drm/xe/vf: New approach for post-migration LRC fixups
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 22:39:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260429203937.2070047-1-tomasz.lis@intel.com> (raw)

The current approach to LRC recovery requires caution from developers
when modifying any LRC-related code. More flexible solution may allow
to avoid future troubles.

The current code also includes LRC creation repeat which looks a bit
suspicious - it was developed without detailed knowledge of which
part of LRC creation requires a repeat. Now after extensive debug we
know that the repeat is only required for BO mapping, and actually
all BOs should be protected, not only the ones storing LRCs.

This fixes a very rare bug where BO would be incorrectly created
during migration resulting in CAT error generated by GPU. Chances
of triggering this error were well below 0.1%.

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>

Tomasz Lis (2):
  drm/xe/vf: Late fixups of LRCs after VF migration
  drm/xe: After VF migration, repeat BO mapping in progress

 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c        | 55 +++++++++++++----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.h        |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c              | 17 +++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c       |  6 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h |  2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c        | 35 +++------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.h        |  2 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_memirq.c            |  8 +++-
 8 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2026-04-29 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-29 20:39 Tomasz Lis [this message]
2026-04-29 20:39 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] drm/xe/vf: Late fixups of LRCs after VF migration Tomasz Lis
2026-04-29 20:39 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] drm/xe: After VF migration, repeat BO mapping in progress Tomasz Lis
2026-04-29 20:57 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/vf: New approach for post-migration LRC fixups Patchwork
2026-04-29 21:52 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-30 10:13 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260429203937.2070047-1-tomasz.lis@intel.com \
    --to=tomasz.lis@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
    --cc=piotr.piorkowski@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox