From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/xe/rtp: Implement a structured parser for rule matching
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:20:08 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260430-rtp-rule-parser-v2-7-157e98b4ab51@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430-rtp-rule-parser-v2-0-157e98b4ab51@intel.com>
The current unwritten grammar for RTP rules is as follows:
rules = disjunction;
disjunction = conjunction { "OR" conjunction };
conjunction = single_rule { single_rule }
/* AND operator is implicit */;
single_rule = ? GRAPHICS_VERSION(...), MEDIA_VERSION(...),
FUNC(...), etc ?;
While rule_matches() currently works for the grammar above, it doesn't
easily resemble it. Let's replace it with an implementation that is
structured in a way to resemble the grammar.
Such a new implementation, although a bit more verbose, is arguably
easier to reason about and to adapt to any extension we do to the
grammer in the future.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c
index 976a2e1f5592..dec9d94e6fb0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c
@@ -30,11 +30,28 @@ static bool has_samedia(const struct xe_device *xe)
return xe->info.media_verx100 >= 1300;
}
-static bool rule_match_item(const struct xe_device *xe,
- struct xe_gt *gt,
- struct xe_hw_engine *hwe,
- const struct xe_rtp_rule *r)
+struct rule_match_ctx {
+ const struct xe_device *xe;
+ struct xe_gt *gt;
+ struct xe_hw_engine *hwe;
+ const struct xe_rtp_rule *rules;
+ const unsigned int n_rules;
+ unsigned int head;
+ int err;
+};
+
+static bool rule_is_item(const struct xe_rtp_rule *r)
+{
+ return r->match_type != XE_RTP_MATCH_OR;
+}
+
+static bool rule_match_item(struct rule_match_ctx *match_ctx)
{
+ const struct xe_device *xe = match_ctx->xe;
+ struct xe_gt *gt = match_ctx->gt;
+ struct xe_hw_engine *hwe = match_ctx->hwe;
+ const struct xe_rtp_rule *r = &match_ctx->rules[match_ctx->head];
+
switch (r->match_type) {
case XE_RTP_MATCH_PLATFORM:
return xe->info.platform == r->platform;
@@ -120,6 +137,63 @@ static bool rule_match_item(const struct xe_device *xe,
}
}
+/*
+ * Match a conjunctive set of rules (rules joined by an implicit "AND").
+ *
+ * Once one item evaluates to false, the remaining items are not evaluated
+ * anymore. Nevetheless, all rules are consumed to allow detecting syntax
+ * errors.
+ */
+static bool rule_match_and(struct rule_match_ctx *match_ctx, bool parse_only)
+{
+ bool match = true;
+ unsigned int count = 0;
+
+ while (match_ctx->head < match_ctx->n_rules &&
+ rule_is_item(&match_ctx->rules[match_ctx->head])) {
+ if (!parse_only)
+ match = rule_match_item(match_ctx);
+
+ if (!match)
+ parse_only = true;
+
+ match_ctx->head++;
+ count++;
+ }
+
+ if (drm_WARN_ON(&match_ctx->xe->drm, !count)) {
+ match_ctx->err = -EINVAL;
+
+ if (!parse_only)
+ match = false;
+ }
+
+ return match;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Match a disjunctive set of rules (subset of rules joined by
+ * "XE_RTP_MATCH_OR").
+ *
+ * Once one subset evaluates to true, the remaining items are not evaluated
+ * anymore. Nevetheless, all rules are consumed to allow detecting syntax
+ * errors.
+ */
+static bool rule_match_or(struct rule_match_ctx *match_ctx)
+{
+ bool match = rule_match_and(match_ctx, false);
+
+ while (match_ctx->head < match_ctx->n_rules &&
+ match_ctx->rules[match_ctx->head].match_type == XE_RTP_MATCH_OR) {
+ /* Consume XE_RTP_MATCH_OR. */
+ match_ctx->head++;
+
+ match = rule_match_and(match_ctx, match);
+ }
+
+ return match;
+}
+
static bool rule_matches_with_err(const struct xe_device *xe,
struct xe_gt *gt,
struct xe_hw_engine *hwe,
@@ -127,55 +201,19 @@ static bool rule_matches_with_err(const struct xe_device *xe,
unsigned int n_rules,
int *err)
{
- const struct xe_rtp_rule *r;
- unsigned int i, rcount = 0;
- bool short_circuit_or = false;
+ struct rule_match_ctx match_ctx = {
+ .xe = xe,
+ .gt = gt,
+ .hwe = hwe,
+ .rules = rules,
+ .n_rules = n_rules,
+ };
+ bool match = rule_match_or(&match_ctx);
if (err)
- *err = 0;
-
- for (r = rules, i = 0; i < n_rules; r = &rules[++i]) {
- if (r->match_type == XE_RTP_MATCH_OR) {
- if (drm_WARN_ON(&xe->drm, !rcount)) {
- if (err)
- *err = -EINVAL;
- continue;
- }
-
- /*
- * This is only reached if a complete conjunction of
- * rules passed, in which case we short-circuit rule
- * evaluation, but still keep parsing to find any syntax
- * errors.
- */
- short_circuit_or = true;
- rcount = 0;
- continue;
- }
-
- if (short_circuit_or || rule_match_item(xe, gt, hwe, r)) {
- rcount++;
- } else {
- /*
- * Advance rules until we find XE_RTP_MATCH_OR to check
- * if there's another set of conditions to check
- */
- while (++i < n_rules && rules[i].match_type != XE_RTP_MATCH_OR)
- ;
-
- if (i >= n_rules)
- return false;
-
- rcount = 0;
- }
- }
-
- if (drm_WARN_ON(&xe->drm, !rcount)) {
- if (err)
- *err = -EINVAL;
- }
+ *err = match_ctx.err;
- return short_circuit_or || rcount;
+ return match;
}
static bool rule_matches(const struct xe_device *xe,
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 20:20 [PATCH v2 0/7] drm/xe/rtp: Miscellaneous improvements to rule matching Gustavo Sousa
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/xe/rtp: Write kunit test cases specific for " Gustavo Sousa
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/xe/rtp: Drop rule matching cases from rtp_to_sr_cases and rtp_cases Gustavo Sousa
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/xe/rtp: Don't short-circuit to false in or-yes case Gustavo Sousa
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/xe/rtp: Do not break parsing when missing context Gustavo Sousa
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] drm/xe/rtp: Extract rule_match_item() Gustavo Sousa
2026-04-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/xe/rtp: Fully parse the ruleset Gustavo Sousa
2026-04-30 20:20 ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2026-04-30 21:02 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/rtp: Miscellaneous improvements to rule matching (rev2) Patchwork
2026-04-30 21:03 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-04-30 21:59 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-05-01 9:25 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260430-rtp-rule-parser-v2-7-157e98b4ab51@intel.com \
--to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox