Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com
Cc: matthew.brost@intel.com, stuart.summers@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 07/11] drm/xe/lrc: Refactor out engine id to hwe conversion
Date: Tue,  5 May 2026 16:44:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260505234408.3552147-20-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260505234408.3552147-13-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>

We need to define more helpers that read engine ID specific register, so
move that logic outside of get_ctx_timestamp().

Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
index 127a2ebc3679..e7f7f0efcf2d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
@@ -2606,17 +2606,27 @@ void xe_lrc_snapshot_free(struct xe_lrc_snapshot *snapshot)
 	kfree(snapshot);
 }
 
-static int get_ctx_timestamp(struct xe_lrc *lrc, u32 engine_id, u64 *reg_ctx_ts)
+static struct xe_hw_engine *engine_id_to_hwe(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 engine_id)
 {
 	u16 class = REG_FIELD_GET(ENGINE_CLASS_ID, engine_id);
 	u16 instance = REG_FIELD_GET(ENGINE_INSTANCE_ID, engine_id);
+	struct xe_hw_engine *hwe = xe_gt_hw_engine(gt, class, instance, false);
+
+	if (xe_gt_WARN_ONCE(gt, !hwe || xe_hw_engine_is_reserved(hwe),
+			    "Unexpected engine class:instance %d:%d for utilization\n",
+			    class, instance))
+		return NULL;
+
+	return hwe;
+}
+
+static int get_ctx_timestamp(struct xe_lrc *lrc, u32 engine_id, u64 *reg_ctx_ts)
+{
 	struct xe_hw_engine *hwe;
 	u64 val;
 
-	hwe = xe_gt_hw_engine(lrc->gt, class, instance, false);
-	if (xe_gt_WARN_ONCE(lrc->gt, !hwe || xe_hw_engine_is_reserved(hwe),
-			    "Unexpected engine class:instance %d:%d for context utilization\n",
-			    class, instance))
+	hwe = engine_id_to_hwe(lrc->gt, engine_id);
+	if (!hwe)
 		return -1;
 
 	if (lrc_to_xe(lrc)->info.has_64bit_timestamp)
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-05 23:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-05 23:44 [PATCH v3 00/11] Support run ticks for multi-queue use case Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] drm/xe/lrc: Use 64 bit ctx timestamp in the LRC snapshot Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] drm/xe: Add timestamp_ms to " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06  3:10   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] drm/xe/lrc: Refactor xe_lrc_timestamp to simplify logic Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06  3:13   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] drm/xe/multi_queue: Refactor check for multi queue support for engine class Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06  3:16   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] drm/xe/multi_queue: Store primary LRC and position info in LRC Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06  3:47   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add helpers to access CS QUEUE TIMESTAMP from lrc Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06  3:25   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-06  5:07   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-05 23:44 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa [this message]
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] drm/xe/multi_queue: Capture queue run times for active queues Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06  3:30   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add trace event for the multi queue timestamp Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06  5:03   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-06 20:25     ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] drm/xe/multi_queue: Use QUEUE_TIMESTAMP as job timestamp for multi-queue Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] drm/xe/multi_queue: Whitelist QUEUE_TIMESTAMP register Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06  3:31   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-05 23:51 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Support run ticks for multi-queue use case (rev3) Patchwork
2026-05-05 23:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260505234408.3552147-20-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
    --to=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
    --cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox