From: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com
Cc: matthew.brost@intel.com, stuart.summers@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 07/11] drm/xe/lrc: Refactor out engine id to hwe conversion
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 16:44:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260505234408.3552147-20-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260505234408.3552147-13-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
We need to define more helpers that read engine ID specific register, so
move that logic outside of get_ctx_timestamp().
Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
index 127a2ebc3679..e7f7f0efcf2d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
@@ -2606,17 +2606,27 @@ void xe_lrc_snapshot_free(struct xe_lrc_snapshot *snapshot)
kfree(snapshot);
}
-static int get_ctx_timestamp(struct xe_lrc *lrc, u32 engine_id, u64 *reg_ctx_ts)
+static struct xe_hw_engine *engine_id_to_hwe(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 engine_id)
{
u16 class = REG_FIELD_GET(ENGINE_CLASS_ID, engine_id);
u16 instance = REG_FIELD_GET(ENGINE_INSTANCE_ID, engine_id);
+ struct xe_hw_engine *hwe = xe_gt_hw_engine(gt, class, instance, false);
+
+ if (xe_gt_WARN_ONCE(gt, !hwe || xe_hw_engine_is_reserved(hwe),
+ "Unexpected engine class:instance %d:%d for utilization\n",
+ class, instance))
+ return NULL;
+
+ return hwe;
+}
+
+static int get_ctx_timestamp(struct xe_lrc *lrc, u32 engine_id, u64 *reg_ctx_ts)
+{
struct xe_hw_engine *hwe;
u64 val;
- hwe = xe_gt_hw_engine(lrc->gt, class, instance, false);
- if (xe_gt_WARN_ONCE(lrc->gt, !hwe || xe_hw_engine_is_reserved(hwe),
- "Unexpected engine class:instance %d:%d for context utilization\n",
- class, instance))
+ hwe = engine_id_to_hwe(lrc->gt, engine_id);
+ if (!hwe)
return -1;
if (lrc_to_xe(lrc)->info.has_64bit_timestamp)
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-05 23:44 [PATCH v3 00/11] Support run ticks for multi-queue use case Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] drm/xe/lrc: Use 64 bit ctx timestamp in the LRC snapshot Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] drm/xe: Add timestamp_ms to " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06 3:10 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] drm/xe/lrc: Refactor xe_lrc_timestamp to simplify logic Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06 3:13 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] drm/xe/multi_queue: Refactor check for multi queue support for engine class Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06 3:16 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] drm/xe/multi_queue: Store primary LRC and position info in LRC Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06 3:47 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add helpers to access CS QUEUE TIMESTAMP from lrc Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06 3:25 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-06 5:07 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-05 23:44 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa [this message]
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] drm/xe/multi_queue: Capture queue run times for active queues Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06 3:30 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] drm/xe/multi_queue: Add trace event for the multi queue timestamp Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06 5:03 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-06 20:25 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] drm/xe/multi_queue: Use QUEUE_TIMESTAMP as job timestamp for multi-queue Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-05 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] drm/xe/multi_queue: Whitelist QUEUE_TIMESTAMP register Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-06 3:31 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-05 23:51 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Support run ticks for multi-queue use case (rev3) Patchwork
2026-05-05 23:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260505234408.3552147-20-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--to=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox