From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Matthew Schwartz" <matthew.schwartz@linux.dev>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Arvind Yadav" <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/pt: prevent invalid cursor access for purged BOs
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 16:20:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260625152054.450125-8-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625152054.450125-5-matthew.auld@intel.com>
During a page table walk for binding, xe_pt_stage_bind() explicitly
skips initializing the xe_res_cursor for purged BOs, treating them
similarly to NULL VMAs by only setting the cursor size.
However, xe_pt_hugepte_possible() and xe_pt_scan_64K() did not check
if the BO was purged before attempting to walk the cursor using
xe_res_dma() and xe_res_next(). Because the cursor was left
uninitialized for purged BOs, this falls through and triggers
warnings like:
WARNING: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_res_cursor.h:274 at xe_res_next
Fix this by explicitly checking if the BO is purged in both
xe_pt_hugepte_possible() and xe_pt_scan_64K(), returning early just
as we do for NULL VMAs, avoiding the invalid cursor accesses entirely.
As a precaution, also zero-initialize the cursor in xe_pt_stage_bind()
to ensure we don't pass garbage data into the page table walkers
if we ever hit a similar edge case in the future.
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/work_items/8418
Fixes: ad9843aac91a ("drm/xe/madvise: Implement purgeable buffer object support")
Assisted-by: Copilot:gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Reported-by: Matthew Schwartz <matthew.schwartz@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
index 0959e0e88a14..b1f6a96dab2e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
@@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ xe_pt_insert_entry(struct xe_pt_stage_bind_walk *xe_walk, struct xe_pt *parent,
static bool xe_pt_hugepte_possible(u64 addr, u64 next, unsigned int level,
struct xe_pt_stage_bind_walk *xe_walk)
{
+ struct xe_bo *bo = xe_vma_bo(xe_walk->vma);
u64 size, dma;
if (level > MAX_HUGEPTE_LEVEL)
@@ -446,8 +447,8 @@ static bool xe_pt_hugepte_possible(u64 addr, u64 next, unsigned int level,
if (next - xe_walk->va_curs_start > xe_walk->curs->size)
return false;
- /* null VMA's do not have dma addresses */
- if (xe_vma_is_null(xe_walk->vma))
+ /* null VMA's and purged BO's do not have dma addresses */
+ if (xe_vma_is_null(xe_walk->vma) || (bo && xe_bo_is_purged(bo)))
return true;
/* if we are clearing page table, no dma addresses*/
@@ -468,6 +469,7 @@ static bool xe_pt_hugepte_possible(u64 addr, u64 next, unsigned int level,
static bool
xe_pt_scan_64K(u64 addr, u64 next, struct xe_pt_stage_bind_walk *xe_walk)
{
+ struct xe_bo *bo = xe_vma_bo(xe_walk->vma);
struct xe_res_cursor curs = *xe_walk->curs;
if (!IS_ALIGNED(addr, SZ_64K))
@@ -476,8 +478,8 @@ xe_pt_scan_64K(u64 addr, u64 next, struct xe_pt_stage_bind_walk *xe_walk)
if (next > xe_walk->l0_end_addr)
return false;
- /* null VMA's do not have dma addresses */
- if (xe_vma_is_null(xe_walk->vma))
+ /* null VMA's and purged BO's do not have dma addresses */
+ if (xe_vma_is_null(xe_walk->vma) || (bo && xe_bo_is_purged(bo)))
return true;
xe_res_next(&curs, addr - xe_walk->va_curs_start);
@@ -708,7 +710,7 @@ xe_pt_stage_bind(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma,
{
struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(tile);
struct xe_bo *bo = xe_vma_bo(vma);
- struct xe_res_cursor curs;
+ struct xe_res_cursor curs = {};
struct xe_vm *vm = xe_vma_vm(vma);
struct xe_pt_stage_bind_walk xe_walk = {
.base = {
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 15:20 [PATCH 0/3] Some fixes for purged BOs Matthew Auld
2026-06-25 15:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: fix NPD in bo_meminfo() Matthew Auld
2026-06-25 19:39 ` Matthew Brost
2026-06-25 15:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: account for dontneed in fdinfo purgeable Matthew Auld
2026-06-25 19:41 ` Matthew Brost
2026-06-25 15:20 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2026-06-25 19:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/pt: prevent invalid cursor access for purged BOs Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260625152054.450125-8-matthew.auld@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=arvind.yadav@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.schwartz@linux.dev \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox