From: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/display: Do not take uncore lock in i915_get_vblank_counter
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 09:21:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260702072154.171324-11-dev@lankhorst.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702072154.171324-1-dev@lankhorst.se>
This fixes a lockdep splat that occurs in the code that should be run
with interrupts disabled. The uncore and DMC locks should not be taken
and released repeatedly in a timing sensitive path.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h | 8 ++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c | 4 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h | 26 +++++++++++++------
| 7 +++++
4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
index 1029790194296..497a308322847 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
@@ -65,6 +65,14 @@ intel_de_read64_2x32(struct intel_display *display, intel_reg_t reg)
return (u64)upper << 32 | lower;
}
+static inline u64
+intel_de_read64_2x32_fw(struct intel_display *display,
+ i915_reg_t lower_reg, i915_reg_t upper_reg)
+{
+ return intel_uncore_read64_2x32_fw(__to_uncore(display),
+ lower_reg, upper_reg);
+}
+
static inline void
intel_de_posting_read(struct intel_display *display, intel_reg_t reg)
{
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
index c0cc0a4c25dbe..5ca22899055d7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
@@ -109,8 +109,8 @@ u32 i915_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
* we get a low value that's stable across two reads of the high
* register.
*/
- frame = intel_de_read64_2x32_volatile(display, PIPEFRAMEPIXEL(display, pipe),
- PIPEFRAME(display, pipe));
+ frame = intel_de_read64_2x32_fw(display, PIPEFRAMEPIXEL(display, pipe),
+ PIPEFRAME(display, pipe));
pixel = frame & PIPE_PIXEL_MASK;
frame = (frame >> PIPE_FRAME_LOW_SHIFT) & 0xffffff;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
index fafc2ca9a2376..507398a562649 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
@@ -449,13 +449,28 @@ static inline void intel_uncore_rmw_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, reg, val);
}
+static inline u64
+intel_uncore_read64_2x32_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
+ i915_reg_t lower_reg, i915_reg_t upper_reg)
+{
+ u32 upper, lower, old_upper, loop = 0;
+ upper = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, upper_reg);
+ do {
+ old_upper = upper;
+ lower = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, lower_reg);
+ upper = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, upper_reg);
+ } while (upper != old_upper && loop++ < 2);
+
+ return (u64)upper << 32 | lower;
+}
+
static inline u64
intel_uncore_read64_2x32(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
i915_reg_t lower_reg, i915_reg_t upper_reg)
{
- u32 upper, lower, old_upper, loop = 0;
enum forcewake_domains fw_domains;
unsigned long flags;
+ u64 ret;
fw_domains = intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(uncore, lower_reg,
FW_REG_READ);
@@ -466,17 +481,12 @@ intel_uncore_read64_2x32(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
spin_lock_irqsave(&uncore->lock, flags);
intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(uncore, fw_domains);
- upper = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, upper_reg);
- do {
- old_upper = upper;
- lower = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, lower_reg);
- upper = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, upper_reg);
- } while (upper != old_upper && loop++ < 2);
+ ret = intel_uncore_read64_2x32_fw(uncore, lower_reg, upper_reg);
intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(uncore, fw_domains);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uncore->lock, flags);
- return (u64)upper << 32 | lower;
+ return ret;
}
static inline int intel_uncore_write_and_verify(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
--git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h
index 08d7ab9336725..764bc94044537 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h
@@ -74,6 +74,13 @@ intel_uncore_read64_2x32(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
return (u64)upper << 32 | lower;
}
+static inline u64
+intel_uncore_read64_2x32_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
+ i915_reg_t i915_lower_reg, i915_reg_t i915_upper_reg)
+{
+ return intel_uncore_read64_2x32(uncore, i915_lower_reg, i915_upper_reg);
+}
+
static inline void intel_uncore_posting_read(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
i915_reg_t i915_reg)
{
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 7:21 [PATCH 00/10] drm/intel/display: Changes required to make vblank evasion PREEMPT_RT safe Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/vblank_work: Add methods to schedule vblank_work in 2 stages Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/vblank: Add a 2-stage version of drm_crtc_arm_vblank_event Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/intel/display: Make intel_crtc_arm_vblank_event static Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-10 14:20 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/intel/display: Convert vblank event handling to 2-stage arming Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915/display: Move vblank put until after critical section Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/display: Remove locking from intel_vblank_evade " Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/display: Handle vlv dsi workaround in scanline_in_safe_range too Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: Use preempt_disable/enable_rt() where recommended Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/display: Make get_vblank_counter use intel_de_read_fw() Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-10 14:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-07-02 7:21 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2026-07-10 14:19 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/display: Do not take uncore lock in i915_get_vblank_counter Ville Syrjälä
2026-07-02 7:56 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/intel/display: Changes required to make vblank evasion PREEMPT_RT safe Patchwork
2026-07-02 7:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-07-02 8:33 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-07-03 2:09 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-07-10 14:43 ` [PATCH 00/10] " Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260702072154.171324-11-dev@lankhorst.se \
--to=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox