From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Austin Hu" <austin.hu@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/fbc: fbc_dirty_rect restrictions and logging
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 22:08:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812220853.73EEF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812215350.3753102-2-austin.hu@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Incorrect coordinate space math in the 180-degree rotation branch causes the FBC dirty rectangle to collapse, breaking FBC tracking.
- [Medium] The 'FBC dirty rect out of range' debug warning will trigger spuriously on almost every frame when the plane is rotated 180 degrees.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/fbc: fbc_dirty_rect restrictions and logging ---
commit 234fb7237db4bb8e467458e88cc6ed3f6e850511
Author: Charlton Lin <charlton.lin@intel.com>
drm/i915/fbc: fbc_dirty_rect restrictions and logging
Clamp the FBC dirty rectangle coordinates to the valid frame buffer
range [y_offset, y_end] to prevent out-of-bounds coordinates, and
log a debug message when clamping occurs.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> index f61b4a218d6ef..c0fed695af0da 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1535,11 +1538,41 @@ __intel_fbc_prepare_dirty_rect(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state,
> return;
> }
>
> - if (drm_rect_visible(damage))
> - *fbc_dirty_rect = *damage;
> - else
> + if (drm_rect_visible(damage)) {
> + int y1, y2;
> +
> + if (plane_state->hw.rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180) {
> + /* Under 180 degree rotation, coordinate system is inverted */
> + int inv_y1 = height - damage->y2;
> + int inv_y2 = height - damage->y1;
> +
> + y1 = clamp(y_offset + inv_y1, y_offset, y_end);
> + y2 = clamp(y_offset + inv_y2, y_offset, y_end);
[Severity: High]
Can this math result in collapsed dirty rectangles?
Because damage->y2 already includes the absolute y_offset, height - damage->y2
yields a large negative number. When y_offset is added back, the result falls
well below y_offset, causing both y1 and y2 to unconditionally clamp to
y_offset.
This collapses the FBC dirty rectangle to a 0-height region starting at
y_offset, entirely missing the actual damaged pixels.
> + } else {
> + y1 = clamp(damage->y1, y_offset, y_end);
> + y2 = clamp(damage->y2, y_offset, y_end);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Clamp dirty rect to the valid FB range [y_offset, y_end].
> + * Per Bspec:
> + * start_line >= y_offset
> + * end_line <= y_offset + plane_height
> + */
> + if (y1 != damage->y1 || y2 != damage->y2)
> + drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
> + "[PLANE:%d:%s] FBC dirty rect out of range: y1=%d y2=%d clamped to y1=%d y2=%d (y_offset=%d y_end=%d)\n",
> + plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name,
> + damage->y1, damage->y2, y1, y2, y_offset, y_end);
[Severity: Medium]
Will this warning trigger spuriously on almost every frame when the plane is
rotated 180 degrees?
For 180-degree planes, the code intentionally alters y1 and y2 to represent
inverted coordinates. The warning condition compares these new inverted
coordinates directly against the original, non-inverted coordinates.
Because an inverted coordinate will inherently mismatch a non-inverted one,
this condition evaluates to true on nearly every atomic update involving damage
for rotated planes.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812215350.3753102-1-austin.hu@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 21:53 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/fbc: Dirty rectangle bounds enforcement and CFB nuke handling Austin Hu
2026-08-12 21:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/fbc: fbc_dirty_rect restrictions and logging Austin Hu
2026-08-12 22:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 21:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/fbc: nuke CFB if Plane setting (except for surf addr) changes Austin Hu
2026-08-12 22:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 22:03 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/i915/fbc: Dirty rectangle bounds enforcement and CFB nuke handling Patchwork
2026-08-12 22:44 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812220853.73EEF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=austin.hu@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox