From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Nareshkumar Gollakoti" <naresh.kumar.g@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe/guc: add TDL gfx registers to capture list
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 14:25:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260813142539.209351F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813133037.2912699-6-naresh.kumar.g@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Typographical error in register name 'ROW_INSDONE_TDL_GFX' (missing 'T' in 'INSTDONE').
- [Low] Improper indentation using spaces instead of tabs.
--
--- Patch [5]: [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe/guc: add TDL gfx registers to capture list ---
commit 3c0be61d6ad550502777320cdeb9da502f084893
Author: Nareshkumar Gollakoti <naresh.kumar.g@intel.com>
drm/xe/guc: add TDL gfx registers to capture list
Add ROW_INSDONE_TDL_GFX and SS_LSC_HDC_IDLE_TDL_GFX register
definitions and include them in the XeHPG extended GuC capture register
list.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> index 25014bccd3a69..8c55d766a5a63 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> @@ -572,6 +572,9 @@
> #define EU_SYSTOLIC_LIC_THROTTLE_CTL_WITH_LOCK XE_REG_MCR(0xe534)
> #define EU_SYSTOLIC_LIC_THROTTLE_CTL_LOCK_BIT REG_BIT(31)
>
> +#define ROW_INSDONE_TDL_GFX XE_REG_MCR(0xe580)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[Severity: Medium]
This isn't a bug, but there seems to be a typo in the register name.
Should this be ROW_INSTDONE_TDL_GFX (missing 'T' in INSTDONE)? If userspace
telemetry and GPU hang analysis tools rely on substring matching for
'INSTDONE', they will silently miss this register.
> +#define SS_LSC_HDC_IDLE_TDL_GFX XE_REG_MCR(0xe584)
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but it looks like these definitions use spaces instead of
tabs for alignment, unlike the surrounding macros.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> index 368769857c9b8..a6052da717878 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> @@ -376,7 +376,9 @@ static const struct __ext_steer_reg xehpg_extregs[] = {
> {"SC_INSTDONE", XEHPG_SC_INSTDONE},
> {"SC_INSTDONE_EXTRA", XEHPG_SC_INSTDONE_EXTRA},
> {"SC_INSTDONE_EXTRA2", XEHPG_SC_INSTDONE_EXTRA2},
> - {"INSTDONE_GEOM_SVGUNIT", XEHPG_INSTDONE_GEOM_SVGUNIT}
> + {"INSTDONE_GEOM_SVGUNIT", XEHPG_INSTDONE_GEOM_SVGUNIT},
> + {"ROW_INSDONE_TDL_GFX", ROW_INSDONE_TDL_GFX},
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[Severity: Medium]
Since this string name is exported to userspace and GuC capture tools, will
the misspelled "INSDONE" break tooling expectations that look for "INSTDONE"?
> + {"SS_LSC_HDC_IDLE_TDL_GFX", SS_LSC_HDC_IDLE_TDL_GFX}
> };
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260813133037.2912699-1-naresh.kumar.g@intel.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 13:30 [PATCH 0/6] drm/xe: Capture additional HW register state in devcoredump Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-08-13 13:30 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/xe/devcoredump: Capture GT fuse registers " Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-08-13 13:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 13:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe/devcoredump: Add GuC register snapshot to devcoredump Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-08-13 14:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 13:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/xe/guc: Print register addresses in capture snapshot output Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-08-13 14:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 13:30 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/xe: dump GAM page fault report registers in devcoredump Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-08-13 13:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe/guc: add TDL gfx registers to capture list Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-08-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-13 13:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe: capture L3 node status registers in devcoredump Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-08-13 14:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 13:39 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Capture additional HW register state " Patchwork
2026-08-13 14:27 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-13 15:58 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260813142539.209351F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=naresh.kumar.g@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox