Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	neil.armstrong@linaro.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
	wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/vblank: Use drm_for_each_crtc() in drm_vblank_init()
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 20:56:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814205603.497061F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814203542.1405135-5-lyude@redhat.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Calling `drm_vblank_init` before creating CRTCs results in a zero-size allocation, leading to a kernel crash when vblank features are later used.
--

--- Patch [4]: [PATCH 4/5] drm/vblank: Use drm_for_each_crtc() in drm_vblank_init() ---
commit 4aec980231f556c8a36b5294d67b3d582d49d623
Author: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>

drm/vblank: Use drm_for_each_crtc() in drm_vblank_init()

This patch updates drm_vblank_init() to use the drm_for_each_crtc() iterator
instead of manually counting the number of CRTCs.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> index 17283e8920378..d57405050554f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> @@ -547,19 +547,20 @@ static void drm_vblank_init_release(struct drm_device *dev, void *ptr)
>  int drm_vblank_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> -	unsigned int num_crtcs = dev->mode_config.num_crtc;
> -	unsigned int i;
> +	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>  
>  	spin_lock_init(&dev->vbl_lock);
>  	spin_lock_init(&dev->vblank_time_lock);
>  
> -	dev->vblank = drmm_kcalloc(dev, num_crtcs, sizeof(*dev->vblank), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	dev->vblank = drmm_kcalloc(dev, dev->mode_config.num_crtc,
> +				   sizeof(*dev->vblank), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!dev->vblank)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	dev->has_hw_vblank = true;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < num_crtcs; i++) {
> +	drm_for_each_crtc(crtc, dev) {

[Severity: Critical]
Could this change lead to an uninitialized vblank array and subsequent page
fault for drivers that initialize vblank before creating CRTCs?

For example, in vkms_drv.c:vkms_create(), drm_vblank_init() is called before
vkms_modeset_init() creates the CRTCs:

	ret = drm_vblank_init(&vkms_device->drm);
	if (ret) {
		DRM_ERROR("Failed to vblank\n");
		goto out_devres;
	}

	ret = vkms_modeset_init(vkms_device);

Because the CRTCs are not yet created at this point, dev->mode_config.num_crtc
is 0. The allocation for the vblank array becomes a 0-byte allocation,
returning ZERO_SIZE_PTR (0x10). The drm_for_each_crtc() loop then executes 0
times, and drm_vblank_init() successfully returns 0.

When userspace later calls DRM_IOCTL_WAIT_VBLANK, the kernel looks up the
CRTC using drm_vblank_crtc(dev, pipe). This returns a pointer into the array,
which evaluates to ZERO_SIZE_PTR + pipe * sizeof(...).

Will dereferencing this pointer cause an immediate kernel OOPS?

> +		unsigned int i = crtc->index;
>  		struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = drm_vblank_crtc(dev, i);
>  
>  		vblank->dev = dev;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260814203542.1405135-1-lyude@redhat.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-14 20:35 [PATCH 0/5] drm/vblank: Enforce all-or-nothing vblank support Lyude Paul
2026-08-14 20:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/vblank: Add drm_device.has_hw_vblank Lyude Paul
2026-08-14 20:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/vblank: Remove drm->num_crtcs Lyude Paul
2026-08-14 20:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/vblank: Remove num_crtcs argument from drm_vblank_init() Lyude Paul
2026-08-14 20:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 20:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/vblank: Use drm_for_each_crtc() in drm_vblank_init() Lyude Paul
2026-08-14 20:56   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-14 20:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/vblank: Require all CRTCs implement vblank support " Lyude Paul
2026-08-14 21:08   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260814205603.497061F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox