From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Stuart Summers" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] drm/xe: Guard configfs attribute reads in getters
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 21:24:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260820212441.20C671F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820210639.107524-13-stuart.summers@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The getters for ctx_restore batch buffers return pointers to configfs-managed memory (`cs`), but drop the configfs reference via `config_group_put` before returning to the caller. This creates a race condition where a concurrent `rmdir` on the configfs directory can free the device configuration memory before the caller finishes using the pointer, leading to a Use-After-Free.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 01/10] drm/xe: Guard configfs attribute reads in getters ---
commit 8e7623fc58ac40897d93827d5632245e67750e49
Author: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
drm/xe: Guard configfs attribute reads in getters
The commit wraps reads of dev->config in configfs getters with a
scoped_guard() to prevent torn reads caused by concurrent stores.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
> index 052cce9621611..0a85043a9dd01 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1308,10 +1313,12 @@ u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_mid_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> if (!dev)
> return 0;
>
> - if (cs)
> - *cs = dev->config.ctx_restore_mid_bb[class].cs;
> + scoped_guard(mutex, &dev->lock) {
> + if (cs)
> + *cs = dev->config.ctx_restore_mid_bb[class].cs;
>
> - len = dev->config.ctx_restore_mid_bb[class].len;
> + len = dev->config.ctx_restore_mid_bb[class].len;
> + }
> config_group_put(&dev->group);
>
> return len;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does dropping the configfs reference here
allow the memory backing the returned pointer to be freed before the caller
finishes using it?
If a concurrent rmdir on the configfs directory drops the group's reference
count to 0, xe_config_device_release() could free the `cs` buffer via kfree().
The caller could then execute a memcpy() using the now-freed pointer,
resulting in a use-after-free.
> @@ -1335,8 +1342,10 @@ u32 xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_post_bb(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> if (!dev)
> return 0;
>
> - *cs = dev->config.ctx_restore_post_bb[class].cs;
> - len = dev->config.ctx_restore_post_bb[class].len;
> + scoped_guard(mutex, &dev->lock) {
> + *cs = dev->config.ctx_restore_post_bb[class].cs;
> + len = dev->config.ctx_restore_post_bb[class].len;
> + }
> config_group_put(&dev->group);
>
> return len;
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does the same use-after-free risk
apply here in xe_configfs_get_ctx_restore_post_bb()? The memory backing `cs`
could similarly be freed when config_group_put() drops the reference to the
configfs group before returning the pointer to the caller.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260820210639.107524-12-stuart.summers@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-20 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 21:06 [PATCH 00/10] Add new debug infrastructure for configfs Stuart Summers
2026-08-20 21:06 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/xe: Guard configfs attribute reads in getters Stuart Summers
2026-08-20 21:24 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-20 21:06 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/xe: Sort xe_config_device fields Stuart Summers
2026-08-20 21:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 21:06 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/xe: Split out configfs data structures Stuart Summers
2026-08-20 21:06 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/xe: Add a new debug focused configfs group Stuart Summers
2026-08-20 21:06 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/xe: Move debug configfs entries to xe_configfs_debug.c Stuart Summers
2026-08-20 21:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 21:06 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/xe/guc: Add configfs support for guc_log_level Stuart Summers
2026-08-20 21:06 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/xe/guc: Add support for NPK as a GuC log target Stuart Summers
2026-08-20 21:06 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/xe: Add infrastructure for debug configfs parameters Stuart Summers
2026-08-20 21:06 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/xe: Migrate existing debug configfs entries to params infrastructure Stuart Summers
2026-08-20 21:06 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/xe: Taint kernel when debug configfs parameters are set Stuart Summers
2026-08-20 21:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 22:12 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add new debug infrastructure for configfs (rev7) Patchwork
2026-08-20 22:13 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-08-20 22:52 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-20 20:07 [PATCH 00/10] Add new debug infrastructure for configfs Stuart Summers
2026-08-20 20:07 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/xe: Guard configfs attribute reads in getters Stuart Summers
2026-08-20 20:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 19:45 [PATCH 00/10] Add new debug infrastructure for configfs Stuart Summers
2026-08-07 19:45 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/xe: Guard configfs attribute reads in getters Stuart Summers
2026-08-05 23:20 [PATCH 00/10] Add new debug infrastructure for configfs Stuart Summers
2026-08-05 23:20 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/xe: Guard configfs attribute reads in getters Stuart Summers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260820212441.20C671F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox