From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Raag Jadav" <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 09/10] drm/xe/pci: Introduce PCIe Function Level Reset
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 11:39:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821113903.AF8D61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821112436.545405-10-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Missing hardware quiescence before PCI reset leads to potential system panics.
--
--- Patch [9]: [PATCH v10 09/10] drm/xe/pci: Introduce PCIe Function Level Reset ---
commit f3c8299b36fc1f6ea55ecfbcd781c310e60e62ab
Author: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
drm/xe/pci: Introduce PCIe Function Level Reset
This commit introduces PCIe Function Level Reset (FLR) support which
re-initializes hardware state without the need for reloading the driver
from userspace.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
> index 48466d726eae6..81c4e55fae8f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
> [ ... ]
> @@ -142,9 +189,90 @@ static void xe_pci_error_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +static void xe_pci_reset_prepare(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
> + int err;
> +
> + err = xe_pci_reset_skip(xe);
> + if (err) {
> + xe_err(xe, "PCIe FLR not supported\n");
> + goto wedge;
> + }
> +
> + err = xe_device_wedged(xe);
> + if (err)
> + xe_err(xe, "PCIe FLR failed, device in unexpected state\n");
> +
> +wedge:
> + /* Wedge the device to prevent userspace access but don't send the event yet */
> + xe_device_wedged_get(xe);
> + if (err)
> + return;
[Severity: High]
Since xe_pci_reset_prepare() is a void callback, the PCI core will proceed
with the physical reset unconditionally even if we return early here.
If xe_pci_reset_skip(xe) returns true, we jump to the wedge label with err
evaluating to true. This causes the function to return immediately after
xe_device_wedged_get(xe).
Does this skip the hardware quiescence (xe_device_suspend) while the PCI
core still performs the physical reset?
If a user triggers a sysfs reset on a device that skips FLR, could this
leave VRAM mapped and DMA active during the reset, resulting in PCIe
Unsupported Requests and fatal AER faults that panic the system?
> +
> + /*
> + * The hardware could be in corrupted state and access unreliable, but we try to
> + * update data structures and cleanup any pending work to avoid side effects during
> + * PCIe FLR. This will be similar to system suspend flow but without eviction.
> + */
> + err = xe_device_suspend(xe, true);
> + if (err) {
> + xe_err(xe, "Failed to prepare for PCIe FLR\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + xe->flr_prepared = true;
> + xe_info(xe, "Prepared for PCIe FLR\n");
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260821112436.545405-1-raag.jadav@intel.com?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 11:23 [PATCH v10 00/10] Introduce Xe PCIe FLR Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 01/10] drm/xe/uc_fw: Allow re-initializing firmware Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 02/10] drm/xe/guc_submit: Introduce guc_exec_queue_reinit_kernel() Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 03/10] drm/xe/gt: Introduce FLR helpers Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 04/10] drm/xe/bo_evict: Introduce xe_bo_restore_map() Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 05/10] drm/xe/exec_queue: Introduce xe_exec_queue_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 06/10] drm/xe/migrate: Introduce xe_migrate_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 07/10] drm/xe/pm: Introduce xe_device_suspend/resume() Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 08/10] drm/xe: Introduce temporary device wedging Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 09/10] drm/xe/pci: Introduce PCIe Function Level Reset Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:39 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 10/10] drm/xe/doc: Wire up PCI Error Handling Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:31 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce Xe PCIe FLR (rev10) Patchwork
2026-08-21 11:33 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-08-21 12:37 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-21 14:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260821113903.AF8D61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox