From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arvind Yadav" <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/xe/guc: Report reset-request failure using SIGID
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 07:27:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824072745.D9DC21F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824071749.1345374-2-arvind.yadav@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The patch introduces a build breakage by referencing a non-existent header file (`xe_log.h`) and an undefined macro (`xe_log_err`). Additionally, it fails to implement the behavior promised in the commit message by passing the standard error code `-EIO` instead of the specified identifier `XE_SIGID_GT_TDR`.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/xe/guc: Report reset-request failure using SIGID ---
commit 67003dc14864f3bc207ea53dfd2f7eb0b4972a51
Author: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
drm/xe/guc: Report reset-request failure using SIGID
Route the GuC engine reset-request failure through the structured SIGID
logging helper.
> This path was already reported as an error and triggers GT reset recovery,
> so use the GT component and report it with XE_SIGID_GT_TDR.
[Severity: Medium]
The commit message mentions reporting the error with XE_SIGID_GT_TDR, but the
code below passes -EIO instead.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index 864859bd0ccc9..0faeecc7c516d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #include "xe_guc_klv_helpers.h"
> #include "xe_guc_submit_types.h"
> #include "xe_hw_engine.h"
> +#include "xe_log.h"
[Severity: Medium]
Could this introduce a build breakage? It appears xe_log.h does not exist in
the repository.
[ ... ]
> @@ -3360,8 +3361,9 @@ int xe_guc_exec_queue_reset_failure_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len
> reason = msg[2];
>
> /* Unexpected failure of a hardware feature, log an actual error */
> - xe_gt_err(gt, "GuC engine reset request failed on %d:%d because 0x%08X",
> - guc_class, instance, reason);
> + xe_log_err(gt, GT, -EIO,
> + "GuC engine reset request failed on %d:%d because 0x%08X\n",
> + guc_class, instance, reason);
[Severity: Medium]
Is xe_log_err defined anywhere since xe_log.h is missing? It looks like this
might result in an undefined macro error during compilation.
Additionally, as noted above, this passes -EIO instead of the promised
XE_SIGID_GT_TDR identifier.
>
> xe_gt_reset_async(gt);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824071749.1345374-2-arvind.yadav@intel.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 7:17 [PATCH v3 0/1] drm/xe: Report GT TDR and VM rebind faults using SIGID Arvind Yadav
2026-08-24 7:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/xe/guc: Report reset-request failure " Arvind Yadav
2026-08-24 7:27 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260824072745.D9DC21F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=arvind.yadav@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox