From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Raag Jadav" <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/xe/ras: Enable SGUnit PCIe error reporting
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 17:03:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824170328.5FCAA1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824164850.607937-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Medium] The driver improperly imports the 'CXL' module namespace to bypass symbol export restrictions for pcie_aer_is_native().
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The driver directly modifies the PCI configuration space of an unowned upstream switch port (USP) and calls pci_save_state() on it without synchronization.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v1] drm/xe/ras: Enable SGUnit PCIe error reporting ---
commit e3840dec09cb480f65642a26c3093d383b1db319
Author: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
drm/xe/ras: Enable SGUnit PCIe error reporting
Enable SGUnit PCIe error reporting by programming its config space for
upstream error propagation. Adds a native AER sanity check for the upstream
port before programming SGUnit registers.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
> index d25d25f775310..9979fe5b4ceb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -279,6 +292,7 @@ static void ras_usp_aer_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> /* Unmask Uncorrectable Internal Error */
> pci_clear_and_set_config_dword(usp, aer_cap + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK, PCI_ERR_UNC_INTN, 0);
>
> pci_save_state(usp);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does modifying the PCI
configuration space of an unowned upstream switch port (USP) and saving
its state here in ras_usp_aer_init() cause data races?
If multiple GPU endpoints are probed concurrently on the same upstream
port, bypassing the core PCI layer to modify an unowned bridge and calling
pci_save_state(usp) without first acquiring pci_dev_lock(usp) could blindly
overwrite the saved state array and corrupt PM state restorations managed
by the PCI core.
> dev_dbg(&usp->dev, "Uncorrectable Internal Errors downgraded and unmasked\n");
> }
> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS("CXL");
[Severity: Medium]
Is it appropriate to spoof the CXL namespace here to access
pcie_aer_is_native()?
Since pcie_aer_is_native() is explicitly exported to the CXL namespace to
restrict its use to Compute Express Link drivers, masquerading as a CXL
driver to circumvent this boundary seems to violate kernel namespace
protection principles.
If non-CXL endpoint drivers legitimately require generic access to AER
native status, could the PCI core API be made generic instead?
>
> static void ras_send_error_event(struct xe_device *xe, u8 severity, u8 component)
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824164850.607937-1-raag.jadav@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 16:48 [PATCH v1] drm/xe/ras: Enable SGUnit PCIe error reporting Raag Jadav
2026-08-24 17:03 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-24 17:43 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-08-24 21:24 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-08-24 22:16 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-24 23:53 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260824170328.5FCAA1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox