From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Badal Nilawar" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] drm/xe/cper: Add CPER structures and trace event
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 17:51:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825175107.93D371F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825175916.1103841-16-badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] CPER structures use native integer types and C bitfields for a standardized external binary format, causing ABI corruption on non-little-endian architectures.
- [Medium] Tracepoint uses `%pU` to print `guid_t` fields, incorrectly formatting them as big-endian.
--
commit ad510a6c4b7008ac7d33a168936259e5f8400da7
Author: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
drm/xe/cper: Add CPER structures and trace event
Define packed data structures and Intel-specific GUID macros needed
to build Intel GPU CPER (Common Platform Error Record) non-standard
records.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_cper_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_cper_types.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..82167ea4eb161
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_cper_types.h
[ ... ]
> +struct xe_cper_sec_intel_err_hdr {
> + /** @error_class: Error classification (type, component, location, cause) */
> + union {
> + struct {
> + /** @error_class.error_type: RAS error severity */
> + u8 error_type;
> + /** @error_class.error_component: IP block that raised the error */
> + u8 error_component;
> + /** @error_class.tile: Tile number */
> + u8 tile;
> + /** @error_class.instance: Instance within the tile */
> + u32 instance;
> + /** @error_class.cause: Error cause code */
> + u32 cause;
> + /** @error_class.reserved: Reserved, must be zero */
> + u8 reserved;
> + } error_class;
> + /** @class: Raw byte view of the error class */
> + u8 class[12];
> + };
> + /** @first_timestamp: Timestamp of the first occurrence of this error class */
> + u64 first_timestamp;
[Severity: Medium]
Can this native u64 type break the CPER binary layout on big-endian
architectures?
The CPER standard dictates a strict binary layout and requires multi-byte fields
to be little-endian. Using architecture-dependent native integer types like u64
causes the struct's binary representation to vary based on host endianness,
which can produce corrupted CPER records on big-endian architectures.
Should this use explicitly sized and endian-specific types like __le64?
> + /** @sig_id: Aggregated error class SIG ID; set to U32_MAX if unknown */
> + u32 sig_id;
> + /** @error_count: Number of times this error has been observed */
> + u32 error_count;
> + /** @valid_bits: Bitmask indicating which header fields are populated */
> + union {
> + struct {
> + /** @valid_bits.location: @error_class field is valid */
> + u16 location : 1;
[Severity: Medium]
Will this compiler-dependent bitfield cause ABI corruption?
Since bitfield layout is compiler- and architecture-dependent, it breaks the
exact bit-level binary layout required for the CPER standard.
Should this be handled with standard bitwise operations instead?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace_cper.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace_cper.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..6d2dbf5048884
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace_cper.h
[ ... ]
> + TP_printk("dev=%s severity=%d platform_id=%pU fru_id=%pU "
[Severity: Medium]
Does this tracepoint format guid_t fields incorrectly?
The printk format specifier %pU defaults to %pUb, which formats UUIDs in
big-endian byte order (RFC 4122). However, guid_t represents little-endian
UUIDs.
Using %pU instead of %pUl causes the first three components of the GUID to be
incorrectly byte-swapped in the trace output, presenting a corrupted GUID to
userspace consumers.
> + "intel_err_hdr_raw=%s cper_len=%u cper_raw=%s",
> + __get_str(dev), __entry->sev,
> + __entry->platform_id, __entry->fru_id,
> + __print_hex(__entry->ihdr_raw,
> + sizeof(struct xe_cper_sec_intel_err_hdr)),
> + __entry->cper_len,
> + __print_hex(__get_dynamic_array(cper),
> + __entry->cper_len))
> +);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260825175916.1103841-13-badal.nilawar@intel.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 17:59 [PATCH v2 00/11] Add CPER logging support for CRI Badal Nilawar
2026-08-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] drm/xe/xe_ras: Add support to retrieve info queue data " Badal Nilawar
2026-08-25 17:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 0:54 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-25 20:48 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] drm/xe/xe_ras: Refactor get_counter() to return response structure Badal Nilawar
2026-08-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] drm/xe/cper: Add CPER structures and trace event Badal Nilawar
2026-08-25 17:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-28 15:23 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] drm/xe/cper: APIs to prepare and log CPER record Badal Nilawar
2026-08-25 18:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 0:59 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] drm/xe/cper: Prepare Intel CPER error info from info queue Badal Nilawar
2026-08-25 17:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] drm/xe/cper: Log CPER records for aggregate counter retrival Badal Nilawar
2026-08-25 17:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 1:01 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] drm/xe/cper: Allow hardware error CPER reporting from xe_log Badal Nilawar
2026-08-25 17:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 21:27 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] drm/xe/ras: Report device memory errors using SIGID Badal Nilawar
2026-08-25 17:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 20:25 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] drm/xe/ras: Report core compute " Badal Nilawar
2026-08-25 17:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] drm/xe/ras: Report soc internal " Badal Nilawar
2026-08-28 15:20 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] drm/xe/ras: Report correctable " Badal Nilawar
2026-08-25 18:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 18:29 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add CPER logging support for CRI (rev2) Patchwork
2026-08-25 18:31 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-08-25 19:25 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-25 22:06 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-08-26 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] Add CPER logging support for CRI Matt Roper
2026-08-27 20:12 ` Rodrigo Vivi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260825175107.93D371F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox