Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Honglei Huang" <honghuan@amd.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/5] drm/gpusvm: move dma_addr allocation before the notifier lock
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 07:29:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260827072946.6D6301F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260827071449.520398-3-honghuan@amd.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Device mappings are permanently leaked on the error path because `svm_pages->dpagemap` is assigned too late.
--

commit 69970ff2a9a2262bbdbdbce9ebee1a8d4c896b22
Author: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>

drm/gpusvm: move dma_addr allocation before the notifier lock

The dma_addr allocation was in a lazy allocation flow, it needs unlock
and goto map_pages. The allocation only needs npages, so just do it
before taking the lock. Drop the map_pages label and the relock flow, so
the sequence becomes fault, allocate, then lock, validate, map and
unlock. No functional change intended.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c
> index 507ef6f0a60e7..3496cb5688365 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1575,18 +1583,6 @@ int drm_gpusvm_get_pages(struct drm_gpusvm *gpusvm,
>  		goto retry;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!svm_pages->dma_addr) {
> -		/* Unlock and restart mapping to allocate memory. */
> -		drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock(gpusvm);
> -		svm_pages->dma_addr =
> -			kvmalloc_objs(*svm_pages->dma_addr, npages);
> -		if (!svm_pages->dma_addr) {
> -			err = -ENOMEM;
> -			goto err_free;
> -		}
> -		goto map_pages;
> -	}
> -
>  	zdd = NULL;
>  	pagemap = NULL;
>  	num_dma_mapped = 0;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the error path here permanently leak
device mappings?

If dpagemap->ops->device_map() succeeds for some pages in
drm_gpusvm_get_pages(), but a subsequent mapping operation (like
dma_map_page() or dma_iova_link()) fails, the code jumps to err_unmap:

	err_unmap:
		svm_pages->flags.has_dma_mapping = true;
		__drm_gpusvm_unmap_pages(gpusvm, svm_pages, num_dma_mapped);

Inside __drm_gpusvm_unmap_pages(), it reads:

	struct drm_pagemap *dpagemap = svm_pages->dpagemap;

And later checks it before unmapping:

	else if (dpagemap && dpagemap->ops->device_unmap)
		dpagemap->ops->device_unmap(dpagemap, dev, addr);

However, back in drm_gpusvm_get_pages(), svm_pages->dpagemap is only
assigned at the very end of the success path:

	if (pagemap) {
		flags.has_devmem_pages = true;
		drm_pagemap_get(dpagemap);
		drm_pagemap_put(svm_pages->dpagemap);
		svm_pages->dpagemap = dpagemap;
	}

Does this mean that during the error path, svm_pages->dpagemap is NULL,
causing __drm_gpusvm_unmap_pages() to silently skip calling
dpagemap->ops->device_unmap() and permanently leak the mappings?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260827071449.520398-1-honghuan@amd.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-27  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-27  7:14 [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] drm/gpusvm: share one HMM fault across per-device DMA mappings Honglei Huang
2026-08-27  7:14 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/5] drm/gpusvm: extract drm_gpusvm_hmm_fault() helper Honglei Huang
2026-08-27  7:30   ` Matthew Brost
2026-08-27  9:02     ` Huang, Honglei
2026-08-27  7:14 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/5] drm/gpusvm: move dma_addr allocation before the notifier lock Honglei Huang
2026-08-27  7:29   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-27  7:14 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] drm/gpusvm: extract drm_gpusvm_dma_map_pages() helper Honglei Huang
2026-08-27  7:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27  7:14 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/5] drm/gpusvm: let drm_gpusvm_get_pages() map an array of pages Honglei Huang
2026-08-27  7:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27  7:14 ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/5] drm/gpusvm: make the DMA mapping step in get_pages() optional Honglei Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260827072946.6D6301F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=honghuan@amd.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox