From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tejas Upadhyay" <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V19 06/15] drm/xe: Guard teardown paths against purged BOs
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:03:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831080346.9903D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831064942.315720-23-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] `xe_bo_unpin_external()` lacks the `xe_bo_is_purged()` check, leading to pin count underflow for DMA-buf exported BOs.
--
commit b0d5d3f21885703ffe281bfc361768a0213d2668
Author: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
drm/xe: Guard teardown paths against purged BOs
This commit adds xe_bo_is_purged() guards in several teardown paths
to prevent unpinning or mapping a buffer object that was already purged
by VRAM page offlining.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> index c255327669da5..b162753cebb70 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> @@ -3267,6 +3267,9 @@ void xe_bo_unpin(struct xe_bo *bo)
> struct ttm_place *place = &bo->placements[0];
> struct xe_device *xe = xe_bo_device(bo);
>
> + if (xe_bo_is_purged(bo))
> + return;
> +
[Severity: High]
Does xe_bo_unpin_external() also need this xe_bo_is_purged() check?
If a user BO is exported via DMA-buf, the VRAM page offline mechanism
can queue it for offlining. If the DMA-buf importer pins the BO, the
pin count increments. When the VRAM offline worker processes the queue,
it forcefully unpins and purges the BO, leaving the pin count at 0.
When the importer later unpins the BO, it triggers xe_dma_buf_unpin()
which calls xe_bo_unpin_external():
static void xe_dma_buf_unpin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
{
struct drm_gem_object *obj = attach->dmabuf->priv;
struct xe_bo *bo = gem_to_xe_bo(obj);
xe_bo_unpin_external(bo);
}
Since xe_bo_unpin_external() lacks the xe_bo_is_purged() guard, it
will call ttm_bo_unpin() unconditionally. Could this cause a pin count
underflow on the TTM BO and make the BO permanently un-evictable?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831064942.315720-17-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 6:49 [PATCH V19 00/15] Add memory page offlining support Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-31 6:49 ` [PATCH V19 01/15] drm/xe: Link VRAM object with gpu buddy Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-31 6:49 ` [PATCH V19 02/15] drm/xe: Link LRC BO and its execution Queue Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-31 7:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 6:49 ` [PATCH V19 03/15] drm/xe: Export xe_ttm_bo_purge() Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 0:33 ` Matthew Brost
2026-08-31 6:49 ` [PATCH V19 04/15] drm/xe: Handle NULL resource and allow purging of VRAM pages Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-31 6:52 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2026-08-31 7:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 6:49 ` [PATCH V19 05/15] drm/xe/bo: Make xe_bo_is_user() public Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-31 6:49 ` [PATCH V19 06/15] drm/xe: Guard teardown paths against purged BOs Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-31 6:53 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2026-08-31 8:03 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-01 5:05 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-08-31 6:49 ` [PATCH V19 07/15] drm/xe/vram: Extract buddy alloc and free helpers Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-31 8:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 5:10 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-08-31 6:49 ` [PATCH V19 08/15] drm/xe/vram: Add page offline data structures and lifecycle Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-31 6:49 ` [PATCH V19 09/15] drm/xe/vram: Add VRAM page offline fault handler Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-31 6:57 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2026-08-31 8:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 5:48 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-08-31 6:49 ` [PATCH V19 10/15] drm/xe/configfs: Add disable_vram_page_offline attribute Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-31 8:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 5:25 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-08-31 6:49 ` [PATCH V19 11/15] drm/xe/ras: Cache disable_vram_page_offline policy at init Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-31 9:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 5:22 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-08-31 6:49 ` [PATCH V19 12/15] drm/xe/vram: Check disable_vram_page_offline policy in fault handler Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-31 6:49 ` [PATCH V19 13/15] drm/xe: Expose bad VRAM pages via debugfs Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-31 6:55 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2026-08-31 9:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 5:13 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-08-31 6:49 ` [PATCH V19 14/15] drm/xe/uapi: Expose ban reason in EXEC_QUEUE_GET_PROPERTY_BAN Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-31 9:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 9:40 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-08-31 6:49 ` [PATCH V19 15/15] drm/xe: Add fault-inject based VRAM page offline injection Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-31 6:54 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2026-08-31 11:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add memory page offlining support (rev22) Patchwork
2026-08-31 13:28 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-31 13:58 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-08-31 14:04 ` [PATCH V19 00/15] Add memory page offlining support Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-31 14:58 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-01 4:09 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-08-31 17:44 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add memory page offlining support (rev23) Patchwork
2026-08-31 18:32 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-31 22:22 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831080346.9903D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox