From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mika Kuoppala" <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce eudebug interface
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 15:16:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903151629.383F21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903145952.848051-2-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Pending events are inaccessible to the debugger after the target is detached, violating the UAPI contract because the event queue is not drained.
--
commit 048c5c077c45df4be0f59a215d2b70b35b5c5301
Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce eudebug interface
This commit introduces the eudebug interface for the Xe driver. It allows
user-space debuggers to connect, track GPU resources, and listen for resource
creation and destruction events via a file descriptor.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eudebug.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eudebug.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..9fe073f606801
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eudebug.c
[ ... ]
> +static int event_fifo_pending(struct xe_eudebug *d,
> + struct drm_xe_eudebug_event **pending)
> +{
> + struct drm_xe_eudebug_event *e = d->events.pending;
> + unsigned int len, copied;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&d->events.lock);
> +
> + *pending = NULL;
> +
> + if (xe_eudebug_detached(d))
> + return -ENOTCONN;
[Severity: High]
If the target DRM client closes its file descriptor and detaches the debugger
while there are still unread events in the kfifo (such as VM destruction
events), does this check prevent the debugger from reading them?
The UAPI documentation explicitly guarantees that -ENOTCONN is returned if the
debug target is gone and the queue has been drained. Should we allow the queue
to be drained before returning -ENOTCONN?
> +
> + if (d->events.pending_occupied) {
> + *pending = e;
> + return 0;
> + }
[ ... ]
> +static long xe_eudebug_read_event(struct xe_eudebug *d,
> + const u64 arg,
> + const bool wait)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = d->xe;
> + struct drm_xe_eudebug_event __user * const user_orig =
> + u64_to_user_ptr(arg);
> + struct xe_eudebug *reader __free(reader_active) = NULL;
> + struct drm_xe_eudebug_event *event_out __free(kvfree) = NULL;
> + struct drm_xe_eudebug_event user_event;
> + struct drm_xe_eudebug_event *pending;
> + long ret = 0;
> + int pending_len = 0;
> + int fifo_ret;
> +
> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, copy_from_user(&user_event, user_orig, sizeof(user_event))))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, user_event.type != DRM_XE_EUDEBUG_EVENT_READ))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, user_event.len < sizeof(*user_orig)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, user_event.flags))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, user_event.seqno))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, user_event.reserved))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, xe_eudebug_detached(d)))
> + return -ENOTCONN;
[Severity: High]
Similarly, this short-circuits the read ioctl entirely if the target is
detached. Can this be modified to check if the queue is empty first, ensuring
the debugger can pull any pending events leading up to the target's termination?
> +
> + if (test_and_set_bit_lock(XE_EUDEBUG_READER_ACTIVE, &d->flags))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + reader = d;
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260903145952.848051-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 14:59 [PATCH v10 00/27] Intel Xe GPU Debug Support (eudebug) v10 Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 01/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce eudebug interface Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 15:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 02/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Add documentation Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 03/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Add connection establishment documentation Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 04/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce discovery for resources Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 15:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 05/27] drm/xe: Add EUDEBUG_ENABLE exec queue property Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 15:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 06/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce exec_queue events Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 07/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Mark guc contexts as debuggable Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 08/27] drm/xe: Remove ifdef in DRM_GPUVA_OP_DRIVER svm subop checking Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 09/27] drm/xe: Introduce ADD_DEBUG_DATA and REMOVE_DEBUG_DATA vm bind ops Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 15:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 10/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce vm bind and vm bind debug data events Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 15:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 11/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Add ufence events with acks Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 15:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 12/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Add vm open/pread/pwrite Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 15:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 13/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Add userptr vm pread/pwrite Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 15:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 14/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Add hw enablement Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 15:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 15/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce EU control interface Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 15:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 16/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce per device attention scan worker Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 17/27] drm/xe/eudebug_test: Introduce eudebug live tests Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 18/27] drm/xe: Implement SR-IOV and eudebug exclusivity Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 15:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 19/27] drm/xe: Add xe_client_debugfs and introduce debug_data file Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 20/27] drm/xe/pagefault: export pagefault queue properties Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 21/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Add read/count/compare helper for eu attention Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 15:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 22/27] drm/xe/vm: Support for adding null page VMA to VM on request Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 23/27] drm/xe/vm: Add xe_vm_svm_vma_subtract() to carve out a sub-range from an SVM VMA Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 24/27] drm/xe: Support for xe_vma_unbind() Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 25/27] drm/xe: export prep_vma_destroy as xe_vm_prep_vma_destroy Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 26/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce EU pagefault handling interface Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 15:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 27/27] drm/xe/eudebug: Enable EU pagefault handling Mika Kuoppala
2026-09-03 15:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 15:35 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Intel Xe GPU Debug Support (eudebug) v10 Patchwork
2026-09-03 15:37 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-03 15:53 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2026-09-03 16:17 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2026-09-03 16:30 ` [PATCH v10 00/27] " Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-04 3:21 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260903151629.383F21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox