From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/25] drm/xe: Update scheduler job layer to support PT jobs
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:25:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904002514.D25B61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903235842.3401722-8-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Type Confusion in xe_sched_job union leads to kernel pointer leak via trace events and devcoredump
--
commit 6a6fd5ea520b6b9671aa39ce12a2edcd42ab0033
Author: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
drm/xe: Update scheduler job layer to support PT jobs
This commit updates the scheduler job layer to support page table (PT) jobs,
which run entirely on the CPU. It reuses the LRC fence storage by introducing
a union in the xe_sched_job struct to hold PT update arguments when the job
does not require an LRC fence or batch address.
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260228013501.106680-8-matthew.brost@intel.com
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h
> index 0490b1247a6e9..5e1824c36c740 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -71,8 +90,14 @@ struct xe_sched_job {
> bool restore_replay;
> /** @last_replay: last job being replayed */
> bool last_replay;
> - /** @ptrs: per instance pointers. */
> - struct xe_job_ptrs ptrs[];
> + /** @is_pt_job: is a PT job */
> + bool is_pt_job;
> + union {
> + /** @ptrs: per instance pointers. */
> + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct xe_job_ptrs, ptrs);
> + /** @pt_update: PT update arguments */
> + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct xe_pt_update_args, pt_update);
> + };
> };
>
[Severity: Medium]
Does this regression cause a kernel pointer leak when the job is a PT job?
In struct xe_job_ptrs, batch_addr is a 64-bit value that aliases with the
const struct xe_migrate_pt_update_ops *ops pointer in struct
xe_pt_update_args.
When xe_sched_job_snapshot_capture() in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c
captures a snapshot, it appears to unconditionally read batch_addr without
checking if the job is a PT job:
for (i = 0; i < q->width; i++)
snapshot->batch_addr[i] =
xe_device_uncanonicalize_addr(xe, job->ptrs[i].batch_addr);
Similarly, the xe_sched_job trace event in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h
unconditionally reads batch_addr:
__entry->batch_addr = (u64)job->ptrs[0].batch_addr;
Can this type confusion expose kernel function pointers to userspace via
trace events or sysfs devcoredump during a GPU hang?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260903235842.3401722-1-matthew.brost@intel.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 23:58 [PATCH v4 00/25] CPU binds and ULLS on migration queue Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 01/25] drm/xe: Drop struct xe_migrate_pt_update argument from populate/clear vfuns Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 02/25] drm/xe: Add xe_migrate_update_pgtables_cpu_execute helper Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 0:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 03/25] drm/xe: Decouple exec queue idle check from LRC Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 04/25] drm/xe: Add job count to GuC exec queue snapshot Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 05/25] drm/xe: Update xe_bo_put_deferred arguments to include writeback flag Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 06/25] drm/xe: Add XE_BO_FLAG_PUT_VM_ASYNC Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 0:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 0:41 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 07/25] drm/xe: Update scheduler job layer to support PT jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 0:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 08/25] drm/xe: Add helpers to access PT ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 09/25] drm/xe: Add struct xe_pt_job_ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 10/25] drm/xe: Update GuC submission backend to run PT jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 0:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 0:57 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 11/25] drm/xe: Store level in struct xe_vm_pgtable_update Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 0:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 12/25] drm/xe: Don't use migrate exec queue for page fault binds Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 13/25] drm/xe: Enable CPU binds for jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 1:04 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 14/25] drm/xe: Remove unused arguments from xe_migrate_pt_update_ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 15/25] drm/xe: Make bind queues operate cross-tile Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 16/25] drm/xe: Add CPU bind layer Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 1:18 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 17/25] drm/xe: Add device flag to enable PT mirroring across tiles Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 0:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 1:33 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 18/25] drm/xe: Add xe_hw_engine_write_ring_tail Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 19/25] drm/xe: Add ULLS support to LRC Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 20/25] drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to migration layer Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 0:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 1:35 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 21/25] drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to ring ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 22/25] drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to GuC submission Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 0:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 1:41 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 23/25] drm/xe: Enter ULLS for migration jobs upon page fault or SVM prefetch Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 0:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 1:32 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 24/25] drm/xe: Add modparam to enable / disable ULLS on migrate queue Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 23:58 ` [PATCH v4 25/25] drm/xe: Document ULLS for migration jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 0:47 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for CPU binds and ULLS on migration queue (rev6) Patchwork
2026-09-04 0:49 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-04 1:33 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260904002514.D25B61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox