From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jia Yao" <jia.yao@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/guc: skip TDR timeout check when ctx_timestamp is 0 or 1
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 18:20:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904182005.4FBEB1F00A3F@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904180943.3455267-1-jia.yao@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Resetting `job->sample_timestamp` to `U64_MAX` when `ctx_timestamp <= 1` unconditionally bypasses the TDR watchdog if the GPU hangs during context restore, causing an infinite loop that completely disables hang recovery.
--
commit e50d47eb7a620614e04b8e05f251f148a49a7005
Author: Jia Yao <jia.yao@intel.com>
drm/xe/guc: skip TDR timeout check when ctx_timestamp is 0 or 1
This commit updates the TDR timeout check to skip when ctx_timestamp
is 0 or 1. It resets the sampling baseline instead, under the assumption
that the timestamp is not yet valid.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1428,6 +1428,20 @@ static bool check_timeout(struct xe_exec_queue *q, struct xe_sched_job *job)
> return xe_sched_invalidate_job(job, 0);
> }
>
> + /*
> + * A ctx_timestamp of 0 or 1 indicates an invalid timestamp:
> + * - 1 (CONTEXT_ACTIVE) is the cookie written by the WA BB immediately
> + * after a full context restore, before the spinner has run.
> + * - 0 can occur when lrc->ctx_timestamp shadow is uninitialized or was
> + * last updated while the context was being restored.
> + * In both cases the timestamp is not yet valid, so reset the sampling
> + * baseline and wait for the next check_timeout() call.
> + */
> + if (ctx_timestamp <= 1) {
> + job->sample_timestamp = U64_MAX;
> + return false;
> + }
> +
[Severity: High]
Does this unconditionally bypass the TDR watchdog if the GPU hangs during a
context restore?
If the hardware stalls while ctx_timestamp is 0 or 1 (e.g., during context
restore or while the WA BB is executing), check_timeout() will continuously
reset job->sample_timestamp to U64_MAX and return false.
On all subsequent TDR ticks, ctx_timestamp will still be 0 or 1, which does
not equal U64_MAX. Won't this repeat the reset and return false indefinitely,
preventing the DRM scheduler from ever invalidating the job and triggering a
GPU reset?
> job->sample_timestamp = ctx_timestamp;
> ctx_job_timestamp = xe_lrc_ctx_job_timestamp(q->lrc[0]);
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260904180943.3455267-1-jia.yao@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 18:09 [PATCH] drm/xe/guc: skip TDR timeout check when ctx_timestamp is 0 or 1 Jia Yao
2026-09-04 18:17 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-09-04 18:18 ` [PATCH] " Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 22:35 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-09-05 3:40 ` Yao, Jia
2026-09-07 19:17 ` Yao, Jia
2026-09-04 18:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-04 18:55 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2026-09-05 2:18 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260904182005.4FBEB1F00A3F@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jia.yao@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox