From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Umesh Nerlige Ramappa" <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/guc: Reject a duplicate deregister-done G2H
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 23:32:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908233245.E6BB71F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908231854.1218934-5-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Preexisting TOCTOU Use-After-Free race in G2H handlers due to lockless XArray lookup and immediate kfree() of xe_exec_queue.
--
commit 7071b18636a4e1a16b055aa587e7944a18af7e7e
Author: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
drm/xe/guc: Reject a duplicate deregister-done G2H
This commit adds a check to reject duplicate deregister-done G2H messages
during the window where the registered bit is cleared but the guc_id is not
yet freed.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index 99d8c807ff056..e90304e5b9554 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -3323,8 +3323,15 @@ int xe_guc_deregister_done_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len)
> if (unlikely(!q))
> return -EPROTO;
>
> - if (!exec_queue_destroyed(q) || exec_queue_pending_disable(q) ||
> - exec_queue_pending_enable(q) || exec_queue_enabled(q)) {
> + /*
> + * The registered bit is cleared by the first deregister-done, but the
> + * guc_id is only freed once the deferred destroy work has run, so the
> + * lookup above still resolves in between. Checking it here makes a
> + * duplicate notification an error rather than a second destroy.
> + */
> + if (!exec_queue_registered(q) || !exec_queue_destroyed(q) ||
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but this added check may trigger
a use-after-free in certain timing conditions.
The queue is loaded from the XArray locklessly and without taking a reference
count in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c:g2h_exec_queue_lookup:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c:g2h_exec_queue_lookup() {
...
q = xa_load(&guc->submission_state.exec_queue_lookup, guc_id);
...
}
If a duplicate DEREGISTER_DONE G2H message arrives just as the asynchronous
destroy worker (__guc_exec_queue_destroy_async) is tearing down the
xe_exec_queue, the G2H worker can grab a pointer to q just before the destroy
worker calls xa_erase.
Because the lookup does not increment a reference count, and the object is
freed via kfree in __xe_exec_queue_free without waiting for RCU grace periods,
could exec_queue_registered(q) end up dereferencing a freed pointer?
> + exec_queue_pending_disable(q) || exec_queue_pending_enable(q) ||
> + exec_queue_enabled(q)) {
> xe_gt_err(guc_to_gt(guc),
> "DEREGISTER_DONE: Unexpected engine state 0x%04x, guc_id=%d",
> atomic_read(&q->guc->state), q->guc->id);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260908231854.1218934-4-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 23:18 [PATCH 0/2] Some error handling improvements in GuC Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-09-08 23:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/guc: Reject a duplicate deregister-done G2H Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-09-08 23:32 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-08 23:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/guc: Sanity check GuC-reported hwconfig table size Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-09-08 23:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 23:26 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Some error handling improvements in GuC Patchwork
2026-09-08 23:28 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-09 0:14 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-09 8:17 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260908233245.E6BB71F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox